Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Demystifying the factors associated with rural–urban gaps in severe acute malnutrition among under‑fve children in low‑ and middle‑income countries: a decomposition analysis

What explains the underlying causes of rural–urban differentials in severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among under-five children is poorly exploited, operationalized, studied and understood in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).We decomposed the rural–urban inequalities in the associated factors o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/13082
042 |a dc 
720 |a Fagbamigbe, A. F.  |e author 
720 |a Kandala, N. B.  |e author 
720 |a Uthman, A. O.  |e author 
260 |c 2020 
520 |a What explains the underlying causes of rural–urban differentials in severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among under-five children is poorly exploited, operationalized, studied and understood in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).We decomposed the rural–urban inequalities in the associated factors of SAM while controlling for individual, household, and neighbourhood factors using datasets from successive demographic and health survey conducted between 2010 and 2018 in 51 LMIC. The data consisted of 532,680 under-five children nested within 55,823 neighbourhoods across the 51 countries. We applied the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique to quantify the contribution of various associated factors to the observed rural–urban disparities in SAM. In all, 69% of the children lived in rural areas, ranging from 16% in Gabon to 81% in Chad. The overall prevalence of SAM among rural children was 4.8% compared with 4.2% among urban children. SAM prevalence in rural areas was highest in Timor-Leste (11.1%) while the highest urban prevalence was in Honduras (8.5%). Nine countries had statistically significant pro-rural (significantly higher odds of SAM in rural areas) inequality while only Tajikistan and Malawi showed statistically significant pro-urban inequality (p < 0.05). Overall, neighbourhood socioeconomic status, wealth index, toilet types and sources of drinking water were the most significant contributors to pro-rural inequalities. Other contributors to the pro-rural inequalities are birth weight, maternal age and maternal education. Pro-urban inequalities were mostly affected by neighbourhood socioeconomic status and wealth index. Having SAM among under-five children was explained by the individual-, household- and neighbourhood level factors. However, we found variations in the contributions of these factors. The rural–urban dichotomy in the prevalence of SAM was generally significant with higher odds found in the rural areas. Our findings suggest the need for urgent intervention on child nutrition in the rural areas of most LMIC. 
024 8 |a 2045-2322 
024 8 |a ui_art_fagbamigbe_demystifying_2020 
024 8 |a Scientific Reports 10(1), pp. 1-15 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/13082 
653 |a Severe Acute Malnutrition 
653 |a Rural–Urban Inequality 
653 |a Under-Five Children 
653 |a Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition 
245 0 0 |a Demystifying the factors associated with rural–urban gaps in severe acute malnutrition among under‑fve children in low‑ and middle‑income countries: a decomposition analysis