Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Rural–urban differences in quality of life and associated factors among community-dwelling older persons in Oyo state, South-Western Nigeria.

Aim The decline of health and functional status as a result of old age makes it necessary to assess the Quality of Life (QoL) among older persons. There is, however, limited information in this regard from low and middle-income countries such as Nigeria. This study compares the QoL and associated fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/13198
042 |a dc 
720 |a Cadmus, E. O  |e author 
720 |a Adebusoye, L. A.  |e author 
720 |a Owoaje, E.T  |e author 
260 |c 2021 
520 |a Aim The decline of health and functional status as a result of old age makes it necessary to assess the Quality of Life (QoL) among older persons. There is, however, limited information in this regard from low and middle-income countries such as Nigeria. This study compares the QoL and associated factors among rural and urban community-dwelling older persons (≥ 60 years) in Oyo State, Nigeria. Subject and methods A cross-sectional, comparative community-based study was carried out using an interviewer administered, semi-structured questionnaire. The QoL was determined using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Brief Scale (WHOQOLBREF). Data were analysed using Stata version 14 at p < 0.05. Results Overall, 1,180 (588 urban and 592 rural-dwelling) respondents were interviewed. Females constituted more than half of the respondents in both communities, accounting for over two thirds (69.2%) of the population. The mean QoL scores were similar in the psychological (54.2 ± 7.4) and environmental (54.7 ± 9.5) domains. However, the mean score for the physical domain was 69.2 ± 17.0 and 74.1 ± 12 for the social domain. There was no statistically significant difference between mean scores of the QoL in the two locations except in the environmental domain (p < 0.05). Good self-rated health was a common positive predictor of higher mean scores across the four domains in both the rural and urban settings (p < 0.05). Conclusion The rural–urban differences in the mean quality of life scores in the environmental domain in the study and poorer scores in the psychological and environmental domains necessitate areas for targeted intervention and more in-depth research 
024 8 |a 0033-5177 
024 8 |a 1573-7845 
024 8 |a ui_art_cadmus_rural-urban_2021 
024 8 |a Quality and Quantity 56(3), pp. 1327-13440 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/13198 
653 |a Older persons 
653 |a Quality of life 
653 |a Rural–urban 
653 |a Community-based survey 
653 |a Southwest Nigeria 
245 0 0 |a Rural–urban differences in quality of life and associated factors among community-dwelling older persons in Oyo state, South-Western Nigeria.