Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Comparative case studies in integrated care implementation from across the globe: a quest for action

Background: Integrated care is the coordination of general and behavioral health and is a highly promising and practical approach to improving healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. While there is growing interest and investment in integrated care implementation internationally, there are no form...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/13600
042 |a dc 
720 |a Stadnick, N. A.  |e author 
720 |a Sadler, E.  |e author 
720 |a Sandall, J.  |e author 
720 |a Turienzo, C. F.  |e author 
720 |a Bennett, I. M.  |e author 
720 |a Borkan, J.  |e author 
720 |a Oladeji, B.  |e author 
720 |a Gureje, O.  |e author 
720 |a Aarons, G. A.  |e author 
720 |a Sklar, M.  |e author 
260 |c 2019 
520 |a Background: Integrated care is the coordination of general and behavioral health and is a highly promising and practical approach to improving healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. While there is growing interest and investment in integrated care implementation internationally, there are no formal guidelines for integrated care implementation applicable to diverse healthcare systems. Furthermore, there is a complex interplay of factors at multiple levels of influence that are necessary for successful implementation of integrated care in health systems. methods: Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework (Aarons et al., 2011), a multiple case study design was used to address two research objectives: 1) To highlight current integrated care implementation efforts through seven international case studies that target a range of healthcare systems, patient populations and implementation strategies and outcomes, and 2) To synthesize the shared and unique challenges and successes across studies using the EPIS framework. Results: The seven reported case studies represent integrated care implementation efforts from five countries and continents (United States, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Israel, and Nigeria), target a range of clinical populations and care settings, and span all phases of the EPIS framework. Qualitative synthesis of these case studies illuminated common outer context, inner context, bridging and innovation factors that were key drivers of implementation. Conclusions: We propose an agenda that outlines priority goals and related strategies to advance integrated care implementation research. These goals relate to: 1) the role of funding at multiple levels of implementation, 2) meaningful collaboration with stakeholders across phases of implementation and 3) clear communication to stakeholders about integrated care implementation. 
024 8 |a 1472-6963 
024 8 |a ui_art_stadnick_comparative_2019 
024 8 |a BMC Health Services Research 19(899), pp. 1-12 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/13600 
653 |a Integrated care 
653 |a Global healthcare 
653 |a Multiple case study 
653 |a EPIS framework 
245 0 0 |a Comparative case studies in integrated care implementation from across the globe: a quest for action