Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Catastrophizing, pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain

Background: Attention has been drawn to examining the contributions of “catastrophising” to the prediction of pain and disability in individuals with low back pain (LBP). Objectives: This study investigated the proportion of patients with LBP who engaged in catastrophic thinking about pain and its a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/1578
042 |a dc 
720 |a Ogunlana, M. O.  |e author 
720 |a Odole, A. C.  |e author 
720 |a Adejumo, A.  |e author 
720 |a Odunaiya, N.  |e author 
260 |c 2015 
520 |a Background: Attention has been drawn to examining the contributions of “catastrophising” to the prediction of pain and disability in individuals with low back pain (LBP). Objectives: This study investigated the proportion of patients with LBP who engaged in catastrophic thinking about pain and its association with pain intensity and disability. We also investigated the components of pain catastrophising that is predictive of disability. Methods: A total of 275 participants with nonspecific LBP completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the quadruple visual analog scale, and the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ). The associations among pain intensity, disability, and catastrophising were investigated using t test. The components of catastrophising that best predicts disability were investigated using multiple linear regressions, and the level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: The majority (85.5%) of the participants had LBP for more than 6 weeks, with 45.5% of the participants having moderate disability and 52.7% being high catastrophisers. High catastrophisers to pain had a significantly higher rating of pain intensity (p < 0.001) and higher score on the RODQ than low catastrophisers to pain. The main components of catastrophising that predicts disability were magnification (p < 0.001) and rumination (p= 0.006). Conclusion: Clinicians should screen patients with nonspecific LBP for a heightened level of catastrophic thinking and endeavour to manage such when present. 
024 8 |a 1013-7025 
024 8 |a Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal 20, pp. 1-7 
024 8 |a ui_art_ogunlana_catastrophising_2015 
024 8 |a http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/1578 
653 |a "catastrophising; 
653 |a disability; 
653 |a low back; 
653 |a pain" 
245 0 0 |a Catastrophizing, pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain