Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Cervical cytology service in Nigeria: providers’ perspective

It has been noted that efforts to organise an effective screening programme in developing countries will have to find adequate financial resources, develop the infrastructure, train the necessary manpower and elaborate surveillance mechanisms. In our study, we set out to determine (a) just how frequ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2003-07
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/4091
042 |a dc 
720 |a Adesina, O. A.  |e author 
720 |a Babarinsa, I. A.  |e author 
720 |a Fawole, A. O.  |e author 
720 |a Oladokun, A.  |e author 
720 |a Adeniji, R. A.  |e author 
720 |a Adewole, I. F.  |e author 
260 |c 2003-07 
520 |a It has been noted that efforts to organise an effective screening programme in developing countries will have to find adequate financial resources, develop the infrastructure, train the necessary manpower and elaborate surveillance mechanisms. In our study, we set out to determine (a) just how frequent is cervical cancer, to warrant the investment of funds in screening programmes; (b) what proportion of surveyed health facilities offer a cervical cytology screening programme; and (c) what basic facilities are currently available where such programmes exist? A pretested, self-completed questionnaire was sent to heads of department of obstetrics and gynaecology in public tertiary and secondary care hospitals in Nigeria as well as major mission hospitals. The response rate was 63%, monthly consultations included a mean of 114 (±11.7) new gynaecological patients and an average of 5 (4.7±0.8) cervical cancer cases. One-half of the institutions had a hospital-based cervical screening programme with an average of 27 patients being screened monthly. Finance was the main difficulty encountered in maintaining a screening service. Only four had a certified gynaecological oncologist. In conclusion, there is dismal utilization of available services and a dearth of trained specialists should any cervical cancer screening programme be considered. 
024 8 |a 0144-3615 
024 8 |a 1364-6893 
024 8 |a Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23(4), pp. 416-418 
024 8 |a ui_art_adesina_cervical_2003 
024 8 |a http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/4091 
245 0 0 |a Cervical cytology service in Nigeria: providers’ perspective