Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Corporate governance and firm performance: case of selected oil companies in Nigeria

Separating ownership from managerial control in publicly traded firms made corporate governance a matter of necessity, due to the possibility of principal agent problem. Mostly, managers protect their own self-interest without regard for shareholders’ returns on investment, this often lead to agency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2020-04
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/9741
042 |a dc 
720 |a Ilemobayo, O.O.  |e author 
720 |a Oke, M.A.  |e author 
720 |a Yusuf, S.A.  |e author 
260 |c 2020-04 
520 |a Separating ownership from managerial control in publicly traded firms made corporate governance a matter of necessity, due to the possibility of principal agent problem. Mostly, managers protect their own self-interest without regard for shareholders’ returns on investment, this often lead to agency conflict and consequent loss. Previous studies have focused mainly on manufacturing and banking sector, however, paucity of information exists in areas of oil firms over the years. Hence, effect of corporate governance on performance of listed oil companies in Nigeria from 2009 to 2018 were investigated. Secondary data sourced from Nigeria stock exchange covering 2009 to 2018 were used to examine effect of corporate governance on performance of six oil companies in Nigeria. Data collected include; board size, executive directors’ number, non-executive directors’ number, audit committees’ number, net annual income, shareholders’ equity, net profit/margin, assets for the period, while board composition, return on assets and equity were generated. Data collected were analysed using Cross Sessional Random Effects Model (REM) of regression analysis. Unit root test indicated that all variables were stationary at level. Audit committee (0.803277), (4.363851) exhibited a positive relationship with firms’ performance, though insignificant, while board composition (-2.647377)(-2.647377) and board size (-0.546097) (-2.948961) had an inverse relationship, though significant with ROE and ROA. All the variables jointly influence firms’ performance positively with R2(0.587999,0.597182) and adjusted R2 (0.544499,0.584174) value, respectively. Audit committees enhances firms’ performance; all variables jointly improve firms’ performance. Measures should be put in place to increase audit committees independence and the extent to which they disclose corporate governance information 
024 8 |a IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF).Volume 11, Issue 2 Ser. III (Mar – Apr 2020), Pp11-18 
024 8 |a 2321-5933 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/9741 
653 |a audit committee 
653 |a board composition 
653 |a board composition size 
653 |a return on asset 
653 |a return on equity 
653 |a principal-agent 
653 |a share holder 
245 0 0 |a Corporate governance and firm performance: case of selected oil companies in Nigeria