Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Shelley's epistolary personae
Thesis (PhD (English))--University of Pretoria, 2024.
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613648003792896 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author2 | Brown, Molly |
| author_browse | Brown, Molly |
| author_facet | Brown, Molly |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
| description | Thesis (PhD (English))--University of Pretoria, 2024. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/100742 |
| institution | University of Pretoria (South Africa) |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:39:29.036Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | University of Pretoria |
| publisherStr | University of Pretoria |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| spelling | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/100742 Shelley's epistolary personae Brown, Molly pjsiska@mit.edu Siska, Pamela UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Percy Bysshe Shelley Epistolarity Epistolary personae Letters Audience Thomas Jefferson Hogg Elizabeth Hitchener William Godwin Leigh Hunt Thomas Love Peacock Lord Byron Thesis (PhD (English))--University of Pretoria, 2024. Shelley’s letters have been used to support or discredit arguments about his ideology, biography, or poetry, but few scholarly studies have focused on the letters themselves. This thesis offers the first full-length critical exploration of Shelley's letters. Like his poetry and prose, Shelley’s letters demonstrate his keen awareness of audience: Shelley assumes multiple epistolary identities to engage his correspondents. This study concentrates on the epistolary personae Shelley adopts in letters to six of his closest friends: Thomas Jefferson Hogg, Elizabeth Hitchener, Thomas Peacock, William Godwin, Leigh Hunt, and Lord Byron. It identifies these personae, examines how they change throughout the course of the friendships, and shows how certain core personae are nuanced according to the correspondent. Stephen Behrendt views such nuancing as consciously manipulative, whereas this study sees it as an almost instinctive process rooted in Shelley’s intensely empathetic imagination. The thesis finds that Shelley also uses four main strategies to forge epistolary connections: levelling (elevating or diminishing himself or his correspondent), mirroring (emphasizing the similarities between himself and his correspondent), juxtaposing (defining himself against his correspondent), and projecting (transferring his own circumstances onto his correspondent). It is also suggested that the adoption of personae helped Shelley work out his own identities over time. In early letters, he tries on the flamboyant personae of madman, visionary poet, and radical. In the letters from Switzerland and Marlow, he adopts the personae of country squire, recluse, invalid, man of business, family man, classicist, mentor, and traveller: roles that reflect the rapid development of his personal and professional lives. In the Italian letters, Shelley modifies his established personae and assumes new ones, such as the expatriate and the man of taste. The chronological approach facilitates an understanding of how Shelley’s personae develop and whether certain personae are especially characteristic of particular periods in Shelley’s life. The thesis also comments more briefly on the relation between public and private epistolary selves; the dynamics of artifice versus immediacy and presence versus absence; the effect on epistolary personae of letter-writing conventions and the material aspects of letters; and, finally, the therapeutic function of letter writing. English PhD (English) Unrestricted Faculty of Humanities 2025-02-11T20:31:12Z 2025-02-11T20:31:12Z 2025-05 2024-11 Thesis * A2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100742 en © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria |
| spellingShingle | UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Percy Bysshe Shelley Epistolarity Epistolary personae Letters Audience Thomas Jefferson Hogg Elizabeth Hitchener William Godwin Leigh Hunt Thomas Love Peacock Lord Byron Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title | Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title_full | Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title_fullStr | Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title_full_unstemmed | Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title_short | Shelley's epistolary personae |
| title_sort | shelley s epistolary personae |
| topic | UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Percy Bysshe Shelley Epistolarity Epistolary personae Letters Audience Thomas Jefferson Hogg Elizabeth Hitchener William Godwin Leigh Hunt Thomas Love Peacock Lord Byron |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100742 |