Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions

Dissertation (MEng (Chemical Engineering))--University of Pretoria, 2024.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Tichapondwa, Shepherd Masimba
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613535067963392
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Tichapondwa, Shepherd Masimba
author_browse Tichapondwa, Shepherd Masimba
author_facet Tichapondwa, Shepherd Masimba
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MEng (Chemical Engineering))--University of Pretoria, 2024.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/101194
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:41.144Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/101194 A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions Tichapondwa, Shepherd Masimba u18171941@tuks.co.za Yapi, Litha Houghton, Eric Emmanuel UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Tetracycline Emerging contaminants Adsorption Zeolite Na-P1 Silica nanoparticles Fly ash Dissertation (MEng (Chemical Engineering))--University of Pretoria, 2024. Emerging contaminants (ECs) like tetracycline (TC) are generated from various human activities, such as pharmaceutical manufacturing, agricultural runoff, and wastewater discharge. The presence of TC poses severe risks to the environment and public health. Various methods have been proposed for removing TC from water, such as chemical precipitation, membrane filtration, and advanced oxidation processes. However, adsorption has gained prominence as an effective method for removing tetracycline due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and ability to achieve high removal efficiencies. Fly ash is a hazardous byproduct of coal combustion, often discarded in landfills, posing environmental risks. However, it can be repurposed into low-cost adsorbents through various modifications and treatments. Utilizing fly ash-derived adsorbents for tetracycline removal not only helps reduce waste but also provides an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternative to conventional, more expensive adsorbents. This study aimed to develop and evaluate various fly ash (FA)-derived adsorbents for TC removal, leveraging waste materials for environmental sustainability. Firstly, FA was acid-treated with hydrochloric acid to produce acid-modified FA (AM-FA). Secondly, FA was base-treated with sodium hydroxide to yield base-modified FA (BM-FA). Additionally, Zeolite Na-P1 (ZNa-P1) was synthesized from FA using hydrothermal treatment. These three adsorbents were subjected to adsorption tests to compare their adsorption performance. Furthermore, silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) were derived from FA (FA-SiNPs) and subsequently FA-SiNPs was doped with iron to create Fe-SiNPs. For comparison, silica nanoparticles were also synthesized directly from a pure sodium silicate solution (SSSNPs). All silica nanoparticle-based adsorbents (i.e. FA-SiNPs, Fe- SiNPs, SSSNPs) underwent adsorption tests to compare their adsorption efficiency. The comparative adsorption test among FA, AM-FA, BM-FA and ZNa-P1 revealed that BM-FA and ZNa-P1 removed 76 % and 90 % of TC, respectively, compared to 35 % with unmodified FA. AM-FA had the lowest performance, removing just 11 % of TC. ZNa-P1's superior performance was linked to its high zeolite purity, with a high cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 6.37 meq/g and a surface area of 35.7 m2/g. BM-FA, had a larger surface area of 110.8 m2/g, but exhibited a lower CEC of 3.42 meq/g. The adsorption efficiency of these adsorbents was more closely related to CEC than surface area. Optimal TC removal with ZNa-P1 was achieved at 7.5 g/L dosage and pH 5. The adsorption of TC on ZNa-P1 followed pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm model, with a maximum capacity of 46.34 mg/g at 30 °C. Thermodynamic studies with ZNa-P1 indicated that the process was spontaneous and endothermic. The adsorption mechanism of TC on ZNa-P1 involved ion-exchange, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction. The comparative adsorption tests among FA-SiNPs, SSSNPs, and Fe-SiNPs revealed that Fe-SiNPs demonstrated superior performance, removing 59 % of tetracycline, compared to 30 % and 20 % removal by FA-SiNPs and SSSNPs, respectively. The enhanced removal efficiency of Fe-SiNPs was attributed to the iron content, which facilitated TC adsorption through chelation. Optimal TC removal using Fe-SiNPs was achieved at a dosage of 5 g/L and within a pH range of 4-5. The adsorption of TC on Fe-SiNPs followed Elovich kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm model, with a maximum capacity of 32.31 mg/g at 30 °C. Thermodynamic studies with Fe-SiNPs indicated that the adsorption process was spontaneous and exothermic. The adsorption mechanism of TC on Fe-SiNPs was chemisorption involving electrostatic attraction and hydrogen bonding. This study highlights the potential of FA-derived adsorbents, particularly ZNa-P1 and Fe-SiNPs, as sustainable solutions for removing TC from contaminated water. The findings contribute to advancing waste utilization strategies particularly, adsorption, for environmental remediation. National Research Foundation (NRF), Grant number: PMDS22062928923 Chemical Engineering MEng (Chemical Engineering) Unrestricted Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation SDG-12: Responsible consumption and production 2025-02-24T14:26:02Z 2025-02-24T14:26:02Z 2025-04 2024 Dissertation * A2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/101194 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.28472666 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.28472666 en © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Tetracycline
Emerging contaminants
Adsorption
Zeolite Na-P1
Silica nanoparticles
Fly ash
A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title_full A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title_fullStr A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title_short A comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
title_sort comparative study of adsorbents derived from coal fly ash for the adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions
topic UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Tetracycline
Emerging contaminants
Adsorption
Zeolite Na-P1
Silica nanoparticles
Fly ash
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/101194
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.28472666
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.28472666