Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players

Thesis (PhD (International Relations))--University of Pretoria, 2025.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Schoeman, Maxi
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613490031624192
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Schoeman, Maxi
author_browse Schoeman, Maxi
author_facet Schoeman, Maxi
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (PhD (International Relations))--University of Pretoria, 2025.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103421
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:58.250Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103421 Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players Schoeman, Maxi danielamarggraff@gmail.com Marggraff, Daniela Bianka UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Ocean states Small island developing states Foreign policy Indo-Pacific Major players Thesis (PhD (International Relations))--University of Pretoria, 2025. This qualitative study analyses the foreign policy orientations of four Small Island Developing States situated in the Indo-Pacific – Solomon Islands, Fiji, Seychelles and Mauritius – vis-à-vis major players in the international system. Fundamentally, the study grapples with the tension between traditional scholarship, which predominantly portrays small states as passive actors in the international system, and emerging literature that challenges this narrative and highlights their agency. A thematic analysis of official government speeches from these states between 2017 and 2024 is conducted, employing Marijke Breuning’s theoretical framework for analysing small state foreign policy as an emblematic framework reflecting the core assumptions of traditional small state foreign policy conduct. This study evaluates the framework’s explanatory power for these states. Additionally, elite interviews with government officials from the selected states supplement the findings by validating and deepening the insights from the thematic analysis. The findings reveal that Breuning’s dependency-based framework, exemplative of the traditional scholarship, is unable to accurately account for the foreign policy orientations of these states. Instead, by integrating aspects of Holsti’s role theory, this study asserts that these states enact the roles of ‘pioneer’ and ‘activist-challenger’, contrasting sharply with Breuning’s conceptions of compliant and counter-dependent foreign policies. Building on these findings, this study contributes to the extant literature by proposing a framework that articulates an alternative category of small state foreign policy orientations. The framework further expands the current literature by proposing five alternative sources of power for what is identified as ‘Ocean States’: power through position, engagement in international and regional organisations, possession of valued resources, narrative influence, and moral suasion. Ultimately, the study provides an alternative framework for the analysis of the foreign policies of Ocean States that can serve as an analytical tool for scholars and practitioners alike. By reframing small states’ agency and challenging the core assumptions of traditional small state scholarship, this study broadens theoretical approaches and reconceptualises concepts such as power and dependence. This contributes to a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of these Ocean States in the international system, repositioning them from passive pawns to pivotal players. Political Sciences PhD (International Relations) Unrestricted Faculty of Humanities SDG-14: Life below water 2025-07-16T14:21:31Z 2025-07-16T14:21:31Z 2025-09 2025-04 Thesis * S2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103421 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29505191.v1 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29505191 en © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Ocean states
Small island developing states
Foreign policy
Indo-Pacific
Major players
Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title_full Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title_fullStr Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title_full_unstemmed Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title_short Pivotal players or passive pawns? The foreign policy of small island developing states (SIDS) in the Indo-Pacific vis-à-vis major players
title_sort pivotal players or passive pawns the foreign policy of small island developing states sids in the indo pacific vis a vis major players
topic UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Ocean states
Small island developing states
Foreign policy
Indo-Pacific
Major players
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103421
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29505191.v1
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29505191