Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe

Thesis (PhD (Sociology))--University of Pretoria, 2025.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Nilsen, Alf Gunvald
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613483052302336
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Nilsen, Alf Gunvald
author_browse Nilsen, Alf Gunvald
author_facet Nilsen, Alf Gunvald
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (PhD (Sociology))--University of Pretoria, 2025.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103800
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:51.610Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/103800 Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe Nilsen, Alf Gunvald musawami@gmail.com Randinyu, Hugo UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Political ecology Environmental justice Rural development Sustainable livelihoods Power relations Reduce inequality Thesis (PhD (Sociology))--University of Pretoria, 2025. Implementing rural development programmes has burdened rural communities with many unprecedented environmental and developmental issues. However, Zimbabwe is naturally endowed with resources, and rural inhabitants residing where some natural resources are located experience high levels of hunger and poverty. The global rise in concerns regarding the decline of rural livelihoods linked to environmental difficulties has led to the recognition of sustainability as a crucial method for addressing some challenges in international politics. Such a paradox immediately poses significant problems for research, particularly regarding environmental governance, livelihoods and the allocation and regulation of resources. This thesis examines some crucial topics on the rural development paradox, focussing on the impact of environment governance, livelihood strategies, and access to, control over, and ownership of natural resources. A combination of research methodologies, including quantitative and qualitative data collected over a year in the Matobo and Umzingwane districts, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe, form the basis of the research. Two research venues were selected. Based on similarities in resource allocation and different utilisation patterns and governance structures. The data collection involved examining several secondary sources and conducting 100 structured interviews. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted (6-12) participants and 21 key informant interviews. A quantitative approach was employed to investigate the correlation between several indices of sustainable livelihoods and environmental justice and the relationship between various indicators of livelihood sustainability under various policies. In addition, a household survey assessed how families utilise and derive advantages from natural resources in their respective areas. Qualitative methods, such as FDG observation and in-depth interviews, were used to gain insights into perceptions, beliefs and knowledge regarding the phenomena investigated. The thesis highlights that rural communities are vulnerable to internal and external factors undermining their livelihood strategies. Prior resource holders control natural resources with the stated purpose of conservation and efficiency but with a hidden intention to satisfy the interests of investors and those holding influential societal positions. The dominance of asymmetric power relations is one of the key issues that influence development initiatives. These relations have contributed to the intensification of environmental injustices such as the appropriation of land, the displacement of people, the exclusion from decision-making processes, the inability to access and control resources and the recognition of values, norms and knowledge prevalent in rural communities. This study provides insights into fundamental reasons behind policy shortcomings, conflicts, and economic and social inequities. However, the fact that such circumstances continue to occur highlights that natural resources are not only a governance issue but also an inherently political issue involving contestation regarding how social and ecological connections are defined and managed. To comprehend the reasons behind this predicament, the present researcher has utilised theoretical perspectives of political ecology and political economy as an analytical framework. Political ecology looks at the connection between ecological outcomes and power imbalances resulting from governmental and institutional influences on local communities, indigenous populations, and the management of natural resources. This thesis explores how a political ecology framework could address dominant power dynamics identified as the primary cause of environmental injustice. Additionally, it aims to contribute to ongoing academic and policy discussions on environmental governance and sustainable rural livelihood strategies by providing fresh perspectives on issues of informal communities, injustice and exclusion. The research explores why sustainable livelihood development has yet to achieve its objectives by considering adopting an environmental justice approach as an alternative framework for guiding sustainability. The thesis suggests that governments and policymakers should embrace the environmental and justice perspective while formulating sustainable livelihood development. Thesis (PhD)-University of Pretoria 2025 Sociology PhD (Sociology) Unrestricted Faculty of Humanities SDG-05: Gender equality SDG-05: Gender equality SDG-10: Reduces inequalities SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions 2025-08-06T09:41:27Z 2025-08-06T09:41:27Z 2025-09-05 2025-08-05 Thesis * S2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103800 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29828567.v2 © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Political ecology
Environmental justice
Rural development
Sustainable livelihoods
Power relations
Reduce inequality
Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title_full Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title_short Exploring the environmental justice-rural development nexus : the quest for sustainable livelihoods in Zimbabwe
title_sort exploring the environmental justice rural development nexus the quest for sustainable livelihoods in zimbabwe
topic UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Political ecology
Environmental justice
Rural development
Sustainable livelihoods
Power relations
Reduce inequality
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/103800
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29828567.v2