Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
God is King
Dissertation (MTh)--University of Pretoria, 2025.
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | German |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613547834376192 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author2 | Ott, Bernhard |
| author_browse | Ott, Bernhard |
| author_facet | Ott, Bernhard |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
| description | Dissertation (MTh)--University of Pretoria, 2025. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/105363 |
| institution | University of Pretoria (South Africa) |
| language | German |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:37:53.400Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | University of Pretoria |
| publisherStr | University of Pretoria |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| spelling | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/105363 God is King Ott, Bernhard andreas.boppart@cfc.ch Lombaard, Christo Boppart, Andreas UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Metaphor of the king Culture Contextualization Criticism of the king Semantics Communicability Dissertation (MTh)--University of Pretoria, 2025. The present study examined the utilisation of the metaphor of the king and its contextualisation with missional intent. A literature study was conducted in order to answer the question of how the biblical discourse of God's kingship can be contextualised and communicated in an enlightened and authority-critical culture. This study was based on the three-step method «See, Judge, Act». The concept of the reign of God constitutes a pivotal tenet within the Christian theological framework. However, effective communication of this concept necessitates a meticulous approach. Metaphors are known to convey truth, but they are not themselves the truth; therefore, alternative imagery may be more effective. The concept of the «king metaphor» is a particularly challenging one, due to the wide range of divergent interpretations that exist across different cultures and historical periods. In order to minimise misunderstandings, it is necessary to align three perspectives: the original biblical meaning, the speaker's message, and the audience's understanding. The medium of communication exerts an influence on the scope of explanations. In situations where the potential benefits of metaphor are limited, it is important to consider the risks of misunderstanding. A sensitive, context-aware approach is imperative. In the event of an emphasis on a particular aspect, this should be articulated explicitly or alternatively, a different metaphor should be employed. Trusting the Holy Spirit is imperative for navigating this complex translation. The effective use of metaphor demands acknowledgement of tensions, consideration of socio-cultural contexts, communicative sensitivity, the revelation of rich meaning, and flexible adaptation. The integration of dialogue and practical application is also of paramount importance. The depth of use must always be congruent with the medium. These insights can be applied to other biblical metaphors. It is crucial to be mindful of any discrepancies that may arise between the original context, the intended message, and the audience's comprehension. The deliberate selection of metaphors, the allocation of explanation time, and the exploration of alternatives are of critical importance. Dialogue and consultation are essential components in this process, as individual experiences and cultural influences can significantly influence the reception of metaphors. The employment of the «royal metaphor» within an authority-critical culture necessitates three fundamental considerations: 1. Differentiated, careful alignment of perspectives. 2. Seeking dialogue with the audience. 3. Attentively listening to the Holy Spirit for appropriate communication (explain, omit, or replace). The deliberate and reflective utilisation of biblical metaphors constitutes a fundamental theological undertaking. Science of Religion and Missiology MTh Unrestricted Faculty of Theology and Religion SDG-16: Peace,justice and strong institutions 2025-11-19T09:20:59Z 2025-11-19T09:20:59Z 2026-04 2025-08 Dissertation * A2026 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/105363 Disclaimer letter de © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria |
| spellingShingle | UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Metaphor of the king Culture Contextualization Criticism of the king Semantics Communicability God is King |
| title | God is King |
| title_full | God is King |
| title_fullStr | God is King |
| title_full_unstemmed | God is King |
| title_short | God is King |
| title_sort | god is king |
| topic | UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Metaphor of the king Culture Contextualization Criticism of the king Semantics Communicability |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/105363 |