Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness

Thesis (LLD (Mercantile Law))--University of Pretoria, 2025.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Boraine, A. (Andre), 1957-
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613697096024064
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Boraine, A. (Andre), 1957-
author_browse Boraine, A. (Andre), 1957-
author_facet Boraine, A. (Andre), 1957-
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (LLD (Mercantile Law))--University of Pretoria, 2025.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/108129
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:15.875Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/108129 Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness Boraine, A. (Andre), 1957- charlotte.vansittert@up.ac.za Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia) Van Sittert, Charlotte UCTD Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) National Credit Act 34 of 2005 Reckless lending Over-indebtedness Low-income consumers Affordability assessment Regulation 23A Thesis (LLD (Mercantile Law))--University of Pretoria, 2025. This thesis critically examines the effectiveness of the reckless lending provisions contained in the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA), with particular emphasis on the consumer affordability assessment obligations imposed on credit providers. The central question addressed is whether these provisions, especially those introduced through Regulation 23A in the 2014 amendments, have succeeded in improving the position of South Africa’s low-income consumers or whether they have inadvertently created new barriers to credit access and financial relief. The research traces the evolution of the pre-agreement affordability assessment framework, analysing its doctrinal development and practical application, and interrogates whether the regulatory intent of safeguarding vulnerable consumers has been realised in practice. Beyond preventative measures, the study investigates the remedial mechanisms available to low-income consumers who nonetheless fall victim to reckless lending. The debt review process under section 86 of the NCA is subjected to detailed scrutiny, with particular attention to its accessibility, affordability, and procedural effectiveness. Complementary avenues of redress—including alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, the National Credit Regulator, the National Consumer Tribunal, Consumer Courts, and relevant ombuds—are evaluated to determine whether these institutions provide meaningful and equitable relief to over-indebted low-income consumers. For the purposes of this research, ‘low-income consumer’ refers not to the poor or unemployed, but to individuals within the Living Standards Measure (LSM) 5–7 categories, earning between R4 465 and R11 263 per month, who are theoretically capable of repaying credit but remain vulnerable to over-indebtedness. The thesis adopts a doctrinal methodology, drawing on statutory provisions, case law, regulatory instruments, and academic commentary, while situating the South African framework within a comparative and international context. The study benchmarks South Africa’s affordability assessment regime and debt relief mechanisms against international principles and guidelines issued by bodies such as the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the Group of Twenty, and the International Federation of Insolvency Professionals’ International Consumer Debt Report, as well as against the consumer credit regimes of the United Kingdom and Australia. These jurisdictions, with their well-developed responsible lending frameworks, provide valuable comparative insights into balancing consumer protection with financial inclusion. Findings reveal that while Regulation 23A and the broader NCA framework represent important steps towards responsible lending, their implementation has fallen short in addressing the lived realities of low-income consumers. The affordability assessment provisions, though designed to prevent reckless credit, have in practice restricted access to credit for many low-income households, thereby undermining financial inclusion. At the same time, the debt review process and related dispute resolution mechanisms remain prohibitively costly, procedurally complex, and inaccessible to those most in need of relief. As a result, low-income consumers continue to face significant obstacles both in avoiding reckless lending and in obtaining redress once over-indebtedness occurs. The persistence of high levels of indebtedness in South Africa, compounded by structural socio-economic challenges such as unemployment, poverty, and inequality, underscores the urgent need for regulatory reform. The findings clearly indicate that the current framework does not adequately protect low-income consumers and requires reorientation. With reference to international principles and guidelines, the thesis concludes with concrete suggestions for reform, aimed at strengthening consumer protection, enhancing the accessibility of relief mechanisms, and promoting a fairer, more inclusive credit system. In doing so, it contributes to the broader discourse on responsible lending and consumer protection in emerging markets and highlights the imperative of aligning regulatory design with the realities of vulnerable consumers. . Mercantile Law LLD (Mercantile Law) Unrestricted Faculty of Laws SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth 2026-02-12T08:48:04Z 2026-02-12T08:48:04Z 2025-12-10 2025-08-21 Thesis * D2025 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/108129 https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.31323349 en © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
National Credit Act 34 of 2005
Reckless lending
Over-indebtedness
Low-income consumers
Affordability assessment
Regulation 23A
Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title_full Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title_fullStr Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title_full_unstemmed Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title_short Measures to protect and assist low-income consumers against reckless lending and over-indebtedness
title_sort measures to protect and assist low income consumers against reckless lending and over indebtedness
topic UCTD
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
National Credit Act 34 of 2005
Reckless lending
Over-indebtedness
Low-income consumers
Affordability assessment
Regulation 23A
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/108129
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.31323349