Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs

Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2004.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Hill, Enid
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2006
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613575070089216
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Hill, Enid
author_browse Hill, Enid
author_facet Hill, Enid
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Centre for Human Rights, Law Faculty, University of Pretoria
description Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2004.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/1100
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:38:19.381Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/1100 A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs Hill, Enid Sacco, Solomon Frank UCTD HIV/AIDS medicines HIV/AIDS drugs Pharmaceutical products Anti-retroviral drugs Generic drugs World Trade Organisation Intellectual property The agreement on the trade related aspects of intellectual property (TRIPS) Health care Zimbabwe Right to health Socio-economic rights South Africa Human rights Africa Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2004. Prepared under the supervision of Dr. Enid Hill at the American University in Cairo. "Zimbabwe and South Africa are facing an HIV/AIDS epidemic of such proportions that the populations of these countries will markedly decline in the next ten years despite the existence of effective drugs to treat the symptoms of AIDS and dramatically lower the communicability of the virus. These drugs are under patent protection by companies in the developed world and the patents raise the prices above the level of affordability for HIV infected persons in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe has declared a national emergency on HIV/AIDS, apparently in conformance with TRIPS and has issued compulsory licenses to a local company that has started to manufacture and sell cheap anti-retroviral drugs. South Africa has not declared a national emergency and has not invoked the TRIPS flexibilities or utilized flexibilities inherent in its own legislation. However, while thousands of people die every week in the two countries, neither government has yet provided an effective HIV/AIDS policy. Extensive litigation and public pressure in South Africa has led the government to announce a policy of supplying free HIV drugs in public hospitals while the Zimbabwean government has announced the provision of the same drugs, also in public hospitals, apparently utilising the state of emergency. The TRIPS agreement under which the two governments undertook to protect international patents allows compulsory licensing under certain circumstances (not limited to a national emergency) and the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, and subsequent agreements by the Ministerial Council of the WTO allow the manufacture and, in limited circumstances, the parallel importation of generic drugs. These provisions provide a theoretical mechanism for poor countries to ensure their citizens' rights of access to health (care). The research is aimed at identifying the extent of the effectiveness of the legal norms created by Articles 20 and 31 of TRIPS, the Doha Declaration and subsequent Council of Ministers' decisions, which together ostensibly provide a framework to allow provision of generic drugs. It is further aimed at investigating how the state of emergency in Zimbabwe has been utilised to provide cheap generic drugs to Zimbabweans and whether this would be an option for South Africa. A comparison of the legal provisions governing the provision of drugs in the two countries will also be undertaken to examine the extent to which international and national constitutional and legal provisions may be utilised to give effect to the right to health." -- Introduction. http://www.chr.up.ac.za/academic_pro/llm1/dissertations.html Centre for Human Rights LLM 2006-11-16T11:37:00Z 2006-11-16T11:37:00Z 04-Oct 2004 Mini Dissertation Sacco, SF 2004, A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1100> http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1100 en LLM Dissertations 2004(21) Centre for Human Rights, Law Faculty, University of Pretoria 342951 bytes application/pdf application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
HIV/AIDS medicines
HIV/AIDS drugs
Pharmaceutical products
Anti-retroviral drugs
Generic drugs World Trade Organisation
Intellectual property
The agreement on the trade related aspects of intellectual property (TRIPS)
Health care Zimbabwe
Right to health
Socio-economic rights South Africa
Human rights Africa
A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title_full A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title_fullStr A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title_short A comparative study of the implementation in Zimbabwe and South Africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for HIV/AIDS drugs
title_sort comparative study of the implementation in zimbabwe and south africa of the international law rules that allow compulsory licensing and parallel importation for hiv aids drugs
topic UCTD
HIV/AIDS medicines
HIV/AIDS drugs
Pharmaceutical products
Anti-retroviral drugs
Generic drugs World Trade Organisation
Intellectual property
The agreement on the trade related aspects of intellectual property (TRIPS)
Health care Zimbabwe
Right to health
Socio-economic rights South Africa
Human rights Africa
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/1100