Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights

Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2016.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Viljoen, Frans
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613452342657024
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Viljoen, Frans
author_browse Viljoen, Frans
author_facet Viljoen, Frans
collection Thesis
description Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2016.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/110135
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:22.373Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/110135 The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights Viljoen, Frans japhet.biegon@gamil.com Biegon, Japhet Kiplangat Impact Human rights Soft law African Commission Resolutions Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2016. This thesis examines the impact of thematic and country-specific resolutions of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Although the Commission has entrenched the practice of adopting resolutions, little is known about what happens to the resolutions after adoption. Focusing on those resolutions adopted by the Commission by the end of 2014, the thesis draws upon various theories of international law and international relations to define and analyse their impact. Two broad definitions of impact are adopted in the study: (a) ‘direct impact’ (changes in state practices traceable back to the resolutions of the Commission); and (b) ‘indirect impact’ (use and reference of the resolutions by relevant stakeholders for multiple purposes). To gather empirical data of the impact of the resolutions, a methodology combining desk research, interviews, questionnaires and participation in the sessions of the African Commission was adopted. The overall finding of the thesis is that the Commission’s thematic and country-specific resolutions have limited and largely qualified impact. Some thematic resolutions have inspired the enactment of domestic laws but only in a few select countries. Domestic state agents and international institutions seldom use the resolutions in their work, and when they do, the level of use rarely rises above the superficial. Non-state actors (activists, NGOs, and academics) use the resolutions more frequently and innovatively. The resolutions have added succour to their efforts to advocate for human rights change. The thesis also establishes that UN special rapporteurs increasingly draw upon the resolutions either to demonstrate the global spread of a specific norm or to infuse legitimacy in their engagements with African states. The thesis finds that states are sensitive to the Commission’s country-specific resolutions and respond to them, at the discursive level, with a mixture of denial, counterarguments and acknowledgments. Apart from a few tactical concessions aimed at deflecting pressure, there is little evidence of structural changes in human rights practices traceable back to the naming and shaming effect of country-specific resolutions. However, the indirect impact of the resolutions is significant. The resolutions have generated states’ interest in the work and 11 activities of the Commission. This has in turn fostered some dialogue between the Commission and states, on the one hand, and between states and NGOs, on the other. The thesis identifies factors that enhance or constrain the impact of the resolutions. Those factors related to the Commission include ownership, quantity, quality, relevance and visibility of the resolutions. These factors have implications for the legitimacy of the resolutions and thus their impact. The political nature of the state was found to influence impact to the extent that it defines the domestic presence and dynamism of civil society. The dualist versus monist divide was found to have little influence, and so was the hard law versus soft law divide. The weak support for the Commission from the AU and the overall lack of institutional synergy and coordination in the organization adversely affects the impact of the Commission’s resolutions. Centre for Human Rights LLD 2026-05-15T17:26:24Z 2026-05-15T17:26:24Z 16/11/17 2016 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2263/110135 en application/pdf
spellingShingle Impact
Human rights
Soft law
African Commission
Resolutions
The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title_full The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title_fullStr The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title_short The impact of the resolutions of the African commission on human and peoples’ rights
title_sort impact of the resolutions of the african commission on human and peoples rights
topic Impact
Human rights
Soft law
African Commission
Resolutions
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/110135