Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)

Dissertation (LLM (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2008.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Le Roux, Jolandi
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613708111314944
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Le Roux, Jolandi
author_browse Le Roux, Jolandi
author_facet Le Roux, Jolandi
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © University of Pretoria 2007 E949 /
description Dissertation (LLM (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2008.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/25766
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:26.265Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/25766 Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans) Le Roux, Jolandi pietnel@justice.gov.za Nel, Pieter Willem Non-pathological criminal incapacity Criminal capacity UCTD Dissertation (LLM (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2008. This study addresses the principles applicable to criminal capacity in the South African legal system. Focus is drawn to non-pathological criminal incapacity as a complete defence to a criminal charge. Non-pathological criminal incapacity can be described as the temporary inability on the part of the perpetrator to appreciate the wrongfulness of the conduct and/or to act in accordance with this appreciation. This mental inability is due to factors which cannot be ascribed to a pathological condition or mental illness. The study further investigates the application of the subjective and objective test as criteria for the defence of provocation and indicates the preferred test. The study also includes a discussion of the following aspects: • The study further investigates the application of the subjective and objective test as criteria for the defence of provocation Non-pathological criminal incapacity distinguished from pathological criminal incapacity • Non-pathological criminal incapacity distinguished from "sane" automatism • The role of amnesia in considering criminal capacity • The role of the expert witness in considering non-pathological criminal incapacity • Private defence versus battered woman syndrome and cumulative provocation • Criminal capacity and sentence. In the South African law the defence of non-pathological criminal incapacity was considered on numerous occasions by the High and Appeal Court, though mostly unsuccessful. It is also clear that the South African courts confuse the issue and fail to differentiate between the defences of non-pathological criminal incapacity and "sane" automatism. The study indicates that the two defences, though different, coincide. The South African courts increasingly raised the standard and requirements for a successful plea in an attempt to confine the popularity of the "new" defence of non-pathological criminal incapacity. A comparative study of the English and Canadian law indicates that provocation is only considered as a partial defence to murder, and only to reduce murder to manslaughter. The reasoning behind this was to evade the compulsory sentence of life imprisonment for murder by substituting it with a conviction of manslaughter where life imprisonment is not a compulsory sentence. The central question raised in this study is whether non-pathological criminal incapacity be a qualified and complete defence to any criminal charge in the South African law. Finally the study is concluded with a crisp summary of every preceding chapter and valuable recommendations stemming from the research are made. Public Law unrestricted 2013-09-07T00:12:31Z 2008-07-16 2013-09-07T00:12:31Z 2008-04-18 2008-07-16 2008-06-23 Dissertation a 2007 E949 /ag http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25766 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-06232008-121535/ © University of Pretoria 2007 E949 / application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Non-pathological criminal incapacity
Criminal capacity
UCTD
Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title_full Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title_fullStr Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title_full_unstemmed Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title_short Toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse Strafreg (Afrikaans)
title_sort toerekeningsvatbaarheid in die suid afrikaanse strafreg afrikaans
topic Non-pathological criminal incapacity
Criminal capacity
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/25766
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-06232008-121535/