Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education

Thesis (DPhil ( Linguistics))--University of Pretoria, 2007.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Dyers, C.
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613527547576320
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Dyers, C.
author_browse Dyers, C.
author_facet Dyers, C.
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © University of Pretor
description Thesis (DPhil ( Linguistics))--University of Pretoria, 2007.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/27887
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:34.018Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/27887 A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education Dyers, C. Weideman, Albert, 1948- Greyling, W.J. gustav.butler@up.ac.za Butler, Herman Gustav Academic english Academic literacy Academic writing Writing course design Esl teaching and learning Esp/eap Language planning Writing approach Didactics Methodology Language support Tertiary education Postgraduate writing Academic discourse UCTD Thesis (DPhil ( Linguistics))--University of Pretoria, 2007. Academic writing is generally regarded as the most important communication medium through which people in the tertiary academic context choose to communicate their ideas. It is also well known that it is sometimes an arduous process for students to become accustomed to the requirements (the conventions and conditions) that hold for the production of appropriate written texts in this context. The initial impetus for the current study was provided by what appeared to be a significant problem that some supervisors at the University of Pretoria identified in terms of the academic writing ability of their postgraduate students. This study therefore investigates postgraduate academic writing with regard to a number of such issues, and does so within the broader confines of academic literacy. The ultimate purpose of this investigation is to discover how writing interventions may be designed that offer appropriate assistance to students who experience difficulty with their writing. The study commences with an attempt to find support for treating 'academic discourse' as a potentially productive area of academic enquiry. It therefore presents an account on the nature of a 'discourse community', and attempts to ascertain whether there are any grounds on which 'academic discourse' may be regarded as a unique type of discourse used for specific communicative functions in the tertiary academic environment. It further discusses critically some of the traditional features of academic texts. The research then proposes thirteen design principles that serve as injunctions that should be considered in the development of writing courses, and proceeds to a critical discussion of the most important approaches in the teaching and learning of writing. What is evident from this discussion is that none of the historical approaches will, on their own, enable one to design justifiable writing courses. As a result, an eclectic approach is required in order to integrate the strengths of these approaches into a strategy for writing course design that is theoretically and practically justifiable. Subsequently, the critical interpretation of the literature in the first part of the study is used in the design of a framework for writing course design in tertiary education. This framework consists of six focuses that stand in a relationship of dynamic interaction towards a description of the context in which tertiary students write. Thus, relevant aspects concerning the writer, text, reader, institutional context and one's approach to writing are all essential elements that should be carefully considered in terms of their potential influence on the eventual design of materials that will constitute a writing course. The rest of the study consists of an application of the proposed framework that addresses firstly, the perceptions of supervisors at the University about the academic literacy ability of their postgraduate students, as well as their requirements for academic writing. It then proceeds to an investigation of a specific group of students' (from the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences) perceptions about their own academic literacy ability and a determination of their perceptions and expectations of academic writing at university. Because the information that was collected (by means of questionnaires) in both cases mentioned above is mainly perceptual in nature, it was considered essential to determine the academic literacy ability of students in the study group by means of a reliable testing instrument. A written text that these same students produced was further analysed in order to establish possible writing difficulties they experienced. In addition, it was important to confirm certain findings from the supervisor questionnaire, and more specific information had to be collected on particular writing issues that could inform discipline specific writing course design (this was accomplished through focus group interviews with supervisors of the School of Agricultural and Food Sciences). A combination of all the prominent findings of the empirical work mentioned above, as well as insights gained in the literature survey, is then used to make justifiable suggestions for the design of writing course materials for students in the study group. Finally, a number of issues were identified that could not be addressed by this study and, therefore, suggestions are made for future research that may investigate these matters. Unit for Academic Literacy DPhil Unrestricted 2013-09-07T12:34:02Z 2007-09-11 2013-09-07T12:34:02Z 2007-04-12 2007-09-11 2007-09-11 Thesis Butler, HG 2007, A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education, DPhil Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27887> http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27887 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09112007-125845/ © University of Pretor application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Academic english
Academic literacy
Academic writing
Writing course design
Esl teaching and learning
Esp/eap
Language planning
Writing approach
Didactics
Methodology
Language support
Tertiary education
Postgraduate writing
Academic discourse
UCTD
A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title_full A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title_fullStr A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title_full_unstemmed A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title_short A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
title_sort framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
topic Academic english
Academic literacy
Academic writing
Writing course design
Esl teaching and learning
Esp/eap
Language planning
Writing approach
Didactics
Methodology
Language support
Tertiary education
Postgraduate writing
Academic discourse
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27887
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09112007-125845/