Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2012.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613524870561792
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
author_browse Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
author_facet Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2012.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/27927
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:31.320Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/27927 The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960- ruan.mare15@gmail.com Mare, Ruan Unconstitutional Unfair discrimination Canadian law Equality Criminal capacity Pathological criminal incapacity Constitutionality Constitution of the republic of south africa Equality before the law Criminal procedure act Section 78(1b) Section 78(1a) Severance Psychiatry Psychology Expert evidence Justification Mental defect Mental illness UCTD Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2012. This study evaluates the constitutionality of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (CPA), which places the burden of proving criminal capacity on the party who raises the issue, against section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (CRSA). In a legal system such as ours, that has a high regard for equality, any form of unequal treatment must be scrutinised, assessed and, if found to be unjust, rooted out. Even more so where the unequal treatment affects a marginalised minority group such as the mentally disabled. This study weighs section 78(1B) against section 9(1) of the CRSA. It also weighs the section against section 9(3) of the CRSA. Attempts are made to justify possible infringements according to section 36 of the CRSA. An appropriate remedy is then ascertained. This study also provides the historical development of section 78(1B) of the CPA – both in the common law and statute. This study furthermore provides original guidelines and principles in assessing expert evidence where criminal capacity is placed in dispute due to a mental illness or defect of the accused. The main findings are that section 78(1B) infringes on both section 9(1) and section 9(3), that it cannot be justified in terms of section 36 of the CRSA and that the appropriate remedy is the striking out of the whole section from the CPA. Copyright Public Law unrestricted 2013-09-07T12:36:56Z 2012-09-14 2013-09-07T12:36:56Z 2012-04-11 2012-09-14 2012-09-13 Dissertation Mare, R 2011, The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, LLM dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27927 > F12/4/367/gm http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27927 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09132012-180522/ © 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Unconstitutional
Unfair discrimination
Canadian law
Equality
Criminal capacity
Pathological criminal incapacity
Constitutionality
Constitution of the republic of south africa
Equality before the law
Criminal procedure act
Section 78(1b)
Section 78(1a)
Severance
Psychiatry
Psychology
Expert evidence
Justification
Mental defect
Mental illness
UCTD
The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title_full The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title_fullStr The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title_full_unstemmed The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title_short The constitutional validity of section 78(1B) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
title_sort constitutional validity of section 78 1b of the criminal procedure act 51 of 1977 with regard to section 9 of the constitution of the republic of south africa 1996
topic Unconstitutional
Unfair discrimination
Canadian law
Equality
Criminal capacity
Pathological criminal incapacity
Constitutionality
Constitution of the republic of south africa
Equality before the law
Criminal procedure act
Section 78(1b)
Section 78(1a)
Severance
Psychiatry
Psychology
Expert evidence
Justification
Mental defect
Mental illness
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27927
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09132012-180522/