Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites

Dissertation (MSc (Chemical Technology))--University of Pretoria, 2006.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613550405484544
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard
author_browse Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard
author_facet Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2003, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MSc (Chemical Technology))--University of Pretoria, 2006.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/28031
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:55.807Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/28031 Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites Verbeek, Casparus Johannes Reinhard upetd@up.ac.za Mahlangu, Nikiwe Abigail Muscovit Reinforced plastics Thermoplastic composites Phlogopite UCTD Dissertation (MSc (Chemical Technology))--University of Pretoria, 2006. The mechanical properties of particulate filled polymers are influenced significantly by interfacial interactions. The adhesion between the polymer and the filler depends on the area of the interface and the strength of the interaction. The former is related to specific area of the filler while the strength of the interaction can be modified by surface treatment. This study is focused on comparing the reinforcing ability of muscovite and phlogopite with and without surface treatment. Muscovite and phlogopite are two common forms of mica. Mechanical properties such as Young's modulus, tensile strength, elongation and impact strength were used to compare the reinforcing ability of muscovite and phlogopite in EVA composites. The Young's modulus of the surface treated and non-surface treated composites increased with an increase in filler loading. Composites reinforced with muscovite had similar moduli compared to composites reinforced with phlogopite. The tensile strength of phlogopite reinforced composites increased with an increase in filler content while that of muscovite reinforced composites remained constant. Surface modification by both silane and stearic acid reduced the tensile strength of phlogopite reinforced composites. The tensile strength of stearic acid treated muscovite reinforced composites improved but not to the same extent as the silane treated composites. Both muscovite and phlogopite lead to a lowering of the impact strength at high filler loadings while the tensile impact strength of both muscovite and phlogopite reinforced composites improved when using silane and stearic acid. In non-surface treated systems, muscovite reinforced composites showed an initial increase in elongation while the elongation of phlogopite reinforced composites decreased with an increase in filler loading. Elongation at maximum load values, however, increased at low filler loadings, when using stearic acid. It can be concluded that stearic acid is not an effective coupling agent for mica/EVA composites and that the use of silane for phlogopite reinforced composites does not offer any improvement in mechanical properties. Chemical Engineering unrestricted 2013-09-07T12:45:05Z 2005-09-22 2013-09-07T12:45:05Z 2003-09-01 2006-09-22 2005-09-19 Dissertation Mahlangu, NA 2003, Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovite and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites, MEng dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/28031 > H544/ag http://hdl.handle.net/2263/28031 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09192005-155205/ © 2003, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Muscovit
Reinforced plastics
Thermoplastic composites
Phlogopite
UCTD
Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title_full Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title_fullStr Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title_short Comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
title_sort comparison of the reinforcing effect of muscovit and phlogopite in thermoplastic composites
topic Muscovit
Reinforced plastics
Thermoplastic composites
Phlogopite
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/28031
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09192005-155205/