Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa
Dissertation (MSc (Agric) Production Physiology)--University of Pretoria, 2007.
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613501941350400 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author2 | Webb, E.C. (Edward Cottington) |
| author_browse | Webb, E.C. (Edward Cottington) |
| author_facet | Webb, E.C. (Edward Cottington) |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | © University of PretoriaE59/ |
| description | Dissertation (MSc (Agric) Production Physiology)--University of Pretoria, 2007. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/28402 |
| institution | University of Pretoria (South Africa) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:37:09.691Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateRange | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | University of Pretoria |
| publisherStr | University of Pretoria |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| spelling | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/28402 Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa Webb, E.C. (Edward Cottington) lmphiri@gov.bw Umesiobi, D.O. Phiri, Loungo Maninki Gonadal development Body development Pig genotypes UCTD Dissertation (MSc (Agric) Production Physiology)--University of Pretoria, 2007. The effect of genotype and slaughter age on gonadal development, body development and the correlations between these measurements were studied in five pig genotypes (Genotype 1, Genotype 2, Genotype 3, Genotype 4 and Genotype 5) consisting of 112 gilts and 112 boars with initial live weights varying between 25 – 30 kg. The pigs were group-housed in commercial type grower houses and fed a diet consisting of 14 MJ/kg energy, 18 % CP and 1.1 % lysine during the growth period up to a live weight of 65 kg, followed by a diet consisting 13.5 MJ/kg, 16 % CP and 0.9% lysine from 65 kg to 90 kg and then a diet consisting of 13.2 MJ/kg, 15 % CP and 0.7% lysine from 90 kg onwards. Pigs were slaughtered at 116, 130, 144, 158, 172, 186, 200 and 214 days of age. Gonadal growth and development were measured in gilts (ovary length, ovary width, ovary thickness, ovary weight, ovary volume, follicle number, and size of the largest follicle), boars (testis length, testis width, testis weight and testis volume) and body development parameters (slaughter weight, warm carcass weight, carcass length, chest depth, dressing percentage and P2 backfat thickness) were compared. Differences between means were tested using breed, sex and slaughter age as fixed effects, while the relationships between gonadal and body development parameters were evaluated by means of correlation analysis. Genotype 5 had a significantly shorter ovary length than Genotype 4 and Genotype 2. Genotype 2 gilts also had heavier ovaries and larger ovary volumes than Genotype 5 gilts. In boars, Genotype 2 had significantly heavier testes weights than Genotype 5 boars. Genotype 5 boars also tended to have smaller testis volumes than Genotype 2 boars. In body development, Genotype 2 gilts and boars were superior to the Genotype 5 in terms of slaughter and warm carcass weights, while Genotype 3 seconded Genotype 2. The average P2 backfat thicknesses were 11.88 mm and 13.68 mm for boars and gilts respectively. Correlations between gonadal and body development parameters were low to moderate in the gilts (r = -0.305 to 0.555) and moderate to high in boars (r = 0.560 to 0.871). However, dressing percentage, follicle number and size of the largest follicle correlated poorly with all other measurements. It is concluded from the study that although Genotype 5 do not grow to the same size and at the same rate compared to the other genotypes, they appear to be the most suitable for the production of top quality pork in terms of its low backfat thickness. Genotype 5 pigs were also characterized with a slower gonadal growth and body development compared to Genotype 2 pigs. Results from this study suggest that selecting against backfat may delay gonadal development and sexual maturation in pigs. Animal and Wildlife Sciences unrestricted 2013-09-07T13:28:12Z 2006-02-13 2013-09-07T13:28:12Z 2005-06-09 2007-02-13 2006-02-13 Dissertation aE59/a PretoriaE59/ag http://hdl.handle.net/2263/28402 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-02132006-091436/ © University of PretoriaE59/ application/pdf University of Pretoria |
| spellingShingle | Gonadal development Body development Pig genotypes UCTD Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title | Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title_full | Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title_fullStr | Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title_short | Gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in South Africa |
| title_sort | gonadal development and the relationship to body development of pig genotypes in south africa |
| topic | Gonadal development Body development Pig genotypes UCTD |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/28402 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-02132006-091436/ |