Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)

Dissertation (MInstAgrar)--University of Pretoria, 2011.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Marais, D. (Diana)
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613518180646912
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Marais, D. (Diana)
author_browse Marais, D. (Diana)
author_facet Marais, D. (Diana)
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria
description Dissertation (MInstAgrar)--University of Pretoria, 2011.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/29979
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:25.198Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/29979 Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Marais, D. (Diana) Reinhardt, Carl Frederick (Charlie) suzimalan@gmail.com Malan, Anna Susanna Weed control Hibiscus cannabinus l. Herbicide evaluation Kenaf UCTD Dissertation (MInstAgrar)--University of Pretoria, 2011. Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) was introduced in 2005 as a fibre crop on a commercial scale in the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa. No herbicides have yet been registered for use in this crop. The purpose of this study was to determine the tolerance of kenaf to a total of five pre-emergence and four post-emergence herbicides under semi- and fully controlled conditions. The herbicides were chosen based on their potential safety for use in Hibiscus spp. as well as on the weed spectra they are registered for in other crops. Several additional factors were also taken into consideration, such as: temperature, soil depth and timing of herbicide application. Four pot trials were conducted to determine the separate and combined effects of herbicide, temperature, planting depth and application timing. During the first trial the effects of five pre-emergence herbicides and four post-emergence herbicides were researched. The pre-emergence herbicides were: S-dimethenamid, imazethapyr, fluometuron/prometryn, pendimethalin, S- metolachlor and the post-emergence herbicides were: bentazone, 2,4-DB, monosodium methanearsonate and pyrithiobac sodium. The trials were conducted under either semi-controlled conditions in a glasshouse or in growth cabinets under fully controlled conditions at the Hatfield Experimental Farm of the University of Pretoria. All experiments were conducted with a Hutton soil with 22% clay. Each trial lasted about 40 days to allow for maximum phytotoxicity damage manifestation on the kenaf seedlings. Measurements that were taken included plant height, herbicide damage, weed control efficiency, fresh plant weight, dried plant weight, and dried root weight. The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the statistical likelihood of damage to plants from the herbicides. In Trial 2, 3 and 4 the interaction effects of herbicide and plant depth, herbicide and temperature, and herbicide and application timing were researched respectively. Neither planting depth nor application timing affected the kenaf seedlings negatively, but low temperature in combination with the application of herbicides during germination of seed and seedling emergence had serious deleterious effects on the young kenaf seedlings. Based on the findings the majority of the herbicides can be included in further field trials on Hibiscus cannabinus L. with the exception of S-dimethenamid and fluometuron/prometryn which caused substantial injury to the kenaf seedlings. Copyright Plant Production and Soil Science unrestricted 2013-09-07T17:26:37Z 2011-11-30 2013-09-07T17:26:37Z 2011-09-09 2011-11-30 2011-11-30 Dissertation Malan, AS, 2011, Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) , MInstAgrar (Agronomy) dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/29979 > E11/9/206/hj http://hdl.handle.net/2263/29979 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-11302011-094113/ © 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Weed control
Hibiscus cannabinus l.
Herbicide evaluation
Kenaf
UCTD
Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title_full Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title_fullStr Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title_full_unstemmed Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title_short Herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)
title_sort herbicide evaluation for weed control in kenaf hibiscus cannabinus l
topic Weed control
Hibiscus cannabinus l.
Herbicide evaluation
Kenaf
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/29979
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-11302011-094113/