Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study

Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2012.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Stiglingh, M. (Madeleine)
Format: Thesis
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613487616753664
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Stiglingh, M. (Madeleine)
author_browse Stiglingh, M. (Madeleine)
author_facet Stiglingh, M. (Madeleine)
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2012, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2012.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/30662
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:56.065Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/30662 Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study Stiglingh, M. (Madeleine) Coetzee, Elizabeth Susanna Maria UCTD Disability expenses Prescribed list Taxpayer SARS Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2012. A disabled taxpayer, or a taxpayer caring for a disabled spouse or child, may deduct 100% of disability expenses from taxable income (section 18(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962). For a 2010 year of assessment, disability expenses must meet the following three requirements to be deductible:  The expense should appear on the prescribed list.  It should have been necessarily incurred and paid for (and not recoverable) by the taxpayer.  It should have been incurred in consequence of any physical disability suffered by the taxpayer, his or her spouse or child, or any dependant of the taxpayer. If compared to a 2009 year of assessment, the second and third requirements remained the same. However, the prescribed list only became effective as from 1 March 2009 (i.e. as from the 2010 year of assessment). According to the discussion paper issued by SARS, the prescribed list was introduced to bring clarity as to the type of expenses that qualify and not to add another requirement. The expectation therefore arises that ALL expenses that meet the second and third requirements will appear on the prescribed list. The study explored the possible existence of an expense which had been necessarily incurred and paid by a South African taxpayer during his or her 2010 tax year in consequence of his or her disabled child, but which does not appear on the prescribed list. Data was collected by the researcher by using a questionnaire when having semistructured telephonic interviews with parents of severely disabled children. The results of the study indicate that there were indeed legitimate expenses incurred by the respondents during their 2010 year of assessment that did not appear on the prescribed list. The prescribed list therefore does not cater for all the possible legitimate expenses incurred by the parent of a severely disabled child. Taxation Unrestricted 2013-09-09T07:23:06Z 2012-05-18 2013-09-09T07:23:06Z 2012-04-16 2012-05-18 2012-03-07 Dissertation Coetzee, ESM 2012, Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study, MCom dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/30662 > F12/4/151/gm http://hdl.handle.net/2263/30662 http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-03072012-124752/ © 2012, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Disability expenses
Prescribed list
Taxpayer
SARS
Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title_full Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title_short Evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure : an exploratory study
title_sort evaluation of the completeness of the 2010 list of qualifying disability expenditure an exploratory study
topic UCTD
Disability expenses
Prescribed list
Taxpayer
SARS
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/30662
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-03072012-124752/