Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege

Dissertation (Mcom)--University of Pretoria, 2013.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613469918887936
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
author_browse Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
author_facet Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (Mcom)--University of Pretoria, 2013.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/41183
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:39.169Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/41183 Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege Klein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard) Kubashni.moodley@pkf.co.za Terblanche, Hettie Moodley, Kubashni Tax practitioners Taxation Legal professional privilege Non-legal tax practitioners Constitutional issues UCTD Dissertation (Mcom)--University of Pretoria, 2013. South African taxpayers currently consult either accountants (i.e., non-legal tax practitioners) or attorneys (i.e., legal tax practitioners) in order to acquire tax advice. The qualitative approach adopted in carrying out this study entails the examination of the differing rights applicable to a taxpayer depending on which adviser he decides to approach for tax advice. The concept of legal professional privilege is a common law right which has only ever been applicable to members of the legal profession. However, due to the recent regulation of tax practitioners and the modernisation of the way taxpayers conduct their financial affairs in approaching both attorneys and accountants for tax advice it seems appropriate that this privilege should be extended beyond the legal profession. Upon consideration of the history and requirements of this privilege it is determined that this privilege is amenable to extension. Constitutional principles, with regard to the right to privacy and the right to equality in relation to the taxpayer obtaining the tax advice, are infringed as a result of the limitation imposed whereby only tax advice obtained from an attorney is protected. Lastly, the current legislative stances adopted by foreign jurisdictions, that currently permit or are considering permitting legal professional privilege to apply to tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners illustrate that there is a global movement toward removing the current restrictions on this principle. This has been accomplished by countries such as the United States of America and New Zealand by way of introduction of statutory provisions that allow for tax advice issued by non-legal tax practitioners to be protected from disclosure to the revenue authorities in the respective countries. Based on the research conducted it is concluded that South Africa should therefore follow suit and create a separate statutory provision to protect tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners. Taxation unrestricted 2014-08-12T08:46:43Z 2014-08-12T08:46:43Z 2014-04-01 2014 Mini Dissertation Moodley, K 2014, Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privelege. MCom dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183> F14/4/404/lm http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183 en © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Tax practitioners
Taxation
Legal professional privilege
Non-legal tax practitioners
Constitutional issues
UCTD
Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title_full Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title_fullStr Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title_full_unstemmed Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title_short Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
title_sort encompassing non legal tax practitioners in south africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege
topic Tax practitioners
Taxation
Legal professional privilege
Non-legal tax practitioners
Constitutional issues
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183