Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012

Dissertation (MDIPS)--University of Pretoria, 2013.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Spies, Yolanda Kemp
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613713300717568
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Spies, Yolanda Kemp
author_browse Spies, Yolanda Kemp
author_facet Spies, Yolanda Kemp
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MDIPS)--University of Pretoria, 2013.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/41537
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:31.230Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/41537 The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012 Spies, Yolanda Kemp dawidduplessis@yahoo.com Du Plessis, D.F. (Dawid Francois) United Nations Security Council (UNSC) UCTD Dissertation (MDIPS)--University of Pretoria, 2013. The United Nations Security Council, as highest custodian of peace and security in the international community, is subjected to change in the international environment, but is in itself not inclined to, or likely to change in the near future. This is because its structure is entrenched in international law, which also upholds the pre-eminence of state sovereignty in the prevailing international relations environment. The pre-eminent position bestowed upon the UNSC by the UN Charter and an entrenched international adherence to its current structure, mainly due to conflict’s close association with reality politics and international power structures associated with a pre-dominant interest driven international system of states, make international consensus on changing the UNSC near impossible. This environment is, therefore, subject to the competitive pursuit of state interests and influenced by power relations, as Realists contend. However, this behavioural nature of the international system continues to be challenged in order to conform to the principles that underwrite the philosophies, the theories and the structures of human rights, humanitarian principles, idealism and their correlating systems of law in democracy. South Africa’s diplomatic positioning in this regard since 1994 assumes a structural approach by calling for change in the international system, to broaden international community, and specifically African, contributions to and participation in global governance. As concerns the UNSC, the South African diplomatic agenda has targeted the ingrained hegemony of the Council’s permanent core, the Permanent Five, and their veto. In theory, South Africa subscribes to the Ezulwini Consensus, which is a common African position that demands two permanent seats for the continent. The country has, in line with its diplomatic endeavour, also pronounced itself ready to assume such a seat in a transformed Council, even though Africa has not collectively endorsed (a) candidate(s). In the interim, South Africa is using strategic diplomatic manoeuvres, at the regional as well as global level, to steer the debate on UNSC reform and to lobby for its own permanent inclusion. South Africa, therefore, conducts diplomacy of engagement across the international diplomatic spectrum in support of a diplomacy that seeks to engage rather than isolate or disengage and which is aimed at making a difference in this mediation, creating convergence, also through bridging divergences in the international debate on reform of the UNSC. lmchunu2014 Political Sciences unrestricted 2014-08-22T06:37:32Z 2014-08-22T06:37:32Z 2014-04-23 2013 Mini Dissertation Du Plessis, DF 2014, The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012, MDIPS dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41537> F14/4/494 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41537 en © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
UCTD
The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title_full The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title_fullStr The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title_full_unstemmed The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title_short The debate on United Nations security council reform : South African diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
title_sort debate on united nations security council reform south african diplomatic contributions 1994 to 2012
topic United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41537