Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question

Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Du Plessis, Anton
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613480821981185
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Du Plessis, Anton
author_browse Du Plessis, Anton
author_facet Du Plessis, Anton
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/43674
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:49.486Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/43674 South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question Du Plessis, Anton yrashid@mweb.co.za Sooliman, Quraysha South African foreign policy Human Rights UCTD Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014. Although much has been written about South African foreign policy very little focus has been on the African perspective in analysing policy actions. Furthermore, South Africa has regularly been criticised for being consistent in its criticism of Israel but inconsistent in other human rights issues. This so-called contradiction in South Africa’s foreign policy on Israel in relation to the Palestinian question, when compared to other human rights’ issues, demands an in-depth analysis of the decisions taken by the South African government that is not limited to rigid, pro-West paradigms. South Africa post-1994 is characterised by a context that includes historical experiences of injustice, abuse, apartheid, colonialism, racial discrimination and racial subjugation. It is a country whose leaders and people understand the notion of human indignity because of the impact of supremacist ideologies. The South African government, based on historical, practical and moral (human rights) grounds has indicated its committed support for the Palestinian struggle against Israeli apartheid and occupation. Accordingly, South Africa’s foreign policy stance on Israel has been consistent since 1994, although until 2008, it offered little in terms of real (punitive or sanctioning) action against Israel. Although the focus of this paper is on the Zuma government’s foreign policy on Israel in relation to the Palestinian question, a discussion on pre-1994 South Africa’s symbiotic relations with Israel is included considering the impact of historical experiences in decision making. This study also considers the foreign policy of the Mandela and Mbeki governments on the Palestinian issue which is important in providing a context to the understanding regarding the purported shift and contestation in the Zuma government’s foreign policy on Israel in relation to the Palestinian question. This shift is analysed by highlighting specific foreign policy actions and the role of key actors in attempting to influence those policy actions. From an academic perspective, the author considers four key areas which include a) human rights, b) foreign policy, c) human rights and ethics in foreign policy and d) global apartheid, foreign policy and human rights which are integrated within the structures of analytic eclecticism allowing for multiple levels of analysis. gm2015 Centre for Human Rights LLM Unrestricted 2015-02-17T06:47:45Z 2015-02-17T06:47:45Z 2014-12-10 2014 Dissertation Sooliman, Q 2014, South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question, LLM Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43674> M14/4/485/gm http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43674 en © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle South African foreign policy
Human Rights
UCTD
South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title_full South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title_fullStr South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title_full_unstemmed South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title_short South African foreign policy and human rights : South Africa's foreign policy on Israel (2008-2014) in relation to the Palestinian question
title_sort south african foreign policy and human rights south africa s foreign policy on israel 2008 2014 in relation to the palestinian question
topic South African foreign policy
Human Rights
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43674