Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The grounds for review of CCMA awards

Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Van Eck, B.P.S.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613628702654464
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Van Eck, B.P.S.
author_browse Van Eck, B.P.S.
author_facet Van Eck, B.P.S.
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46012
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:39:10.429Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46012 The grounds for review of CCMA awards Van Eck, B.P.S. Van Graan, Daniël Jacobus UCTD Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014. The grounds for review of arbitration awards are stipulated in section 145 of the Labour Relations Act No 66 of 1995 (hereinafter the “LRA”). However, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter the “CCMA”) is an organ of state and therefore bound by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No 108 of 1996 (hereinafter the “1996 Constitution”). Therefore, the issuing of an arbitration award is bound by section 33 of the 1996 Constitution which requires that administrative should be lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair. It is for this reason that the Constitutional Court (hereinafter the “CC”) in Sidumo & another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) held that section 145 of the LRA is suffused by the constitutional standard of “reasonableness”. The CC in Sidumo subsequently confirmed that the standard of review is whether the decision reached by the CCMA commissioner is one that a reasonable decision-maker could not reach. This dissertation seeks to determine how this standard as laid down in Sidumo influenced the courts’ interpretation of the grounds for review and whether there is certainty by the courts on the interpretation of this test. tm2015 Mercantile Law LLM Unrestricted 2015-07-02T11:06:22Z 2015-07-02T11:06:22Z 2015/04/16 2014 Mini Dissertation Van Graan, DJ 2014, The grounds for review of CCMA awards, LLM Mini-dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012> A2015 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012 en © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title_full The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title_fullStr The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title_full_unstemmed The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title_short The grounds for review of CCMA awards
title_sort grounds for review of ccma awards
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012