Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014.
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613628702654464 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author2 | Van Eck, B.P.S. |
| author_browse | Van Eck, B.P.S. |
| author_facet | Van Eck, B.P.S. |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
| description | Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46012 |
| institution | University of Pretoria (South Africa) |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:39:10.429Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateRange | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | University of Pretoria |
| publisherStr | University of Pretoria |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository |
| spelling | oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46012 The grounds for review of CCMA awards Van Eck, B.P.S. Van Graan, Daniël Jacobus UCTD Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2014. The grounds for review of arbitration awards are stipulated in section 145 of the Labour Relations Act No 66 of 1995 (hereinafter the “LRA”). However, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter the “CCMA”) is an organ of state and therefore bound by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No 108 of 1996 (hereinafter the “1996 Constitution”). Therefore, the issuing of an arbitration award is bound by section 33 of the 1996 Constitution which requires that administrative should be lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair. It is for this reason that the Constitutional Court (hereinafter the “CC”) in Sidumo & another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) held that section 145 of the LRA is suffused by the constitutional standard of “reasonableness”. The CC in Sidumo subsequently confirmed that the standard of review is whether the decision reached by the CCMA commissioner is one that a reasonable decision-maker could not reach. This dissertation seeks to determine how this standard as laid down in Sidumo influenced the courts’ interpretation of the grounds for review and whether there is certainty by the courts on the interpretation of this test. tm2015 Mercantile Law LLM Unrestricted 2015-07-02T11:06:22Z 2015-07-02T11:06:22Z 2015/04/16 2014 Mini Dissertation Van Graan, DJ 2014, The grounds for review of CCMA awards, LLM Mini-dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012> A2015 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012 en © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria |
| spellingShingle | UCTD The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title | The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title_full | The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title_fullStr | The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title_full_unstemmed | The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title_short | The grounds for review of CCMA awards |
| title_sort | grounds for review of ccma awards |
| topic | UCTD |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46012 |