Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam

Dissertation (MScDent)--University of Pretoria, 2014.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613465106972673
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus
author_browse Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus
author_facet Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MScDent)--University of Pretoria, 2014.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46127
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:34.553Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/46127 An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus Seedat, Hussein Cassim UCTD Dissertation (MScDent)--University of Pretoria, 2014. Periapical endodontic surgery may be indicated when orthograde retreatment of failed endodontic therapy is unsuccessful, unfeasible or contraindicated. The sequence of procedures during the surgery includes exposure of the involved apex, root-end resection, root-end cavity preparation and placement of a root-end filling. The root-end filling is necessary in order to provide a hermetic seal, thereby preventing the egress of micro-organisms into the periradicular tissues from the root canal system. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the microleakage of three calcium silicate cements and amalgam when used as retrograde filling materials. One hundred and twenty single rooted, single canal, human teeth with closed apices were collected and stored in Phosphate Buffered Saline after extraction. All root canals were instrumented using ProTaper rotary instruments and obturated by warm vertical condensation using gutta-percha with Topseal Root Canal Sealer. Access cavities were sealed with Fuji IX glass ionomer restorative material. The apical 3mm of each root was resected perpendicular to the long axis of the root and root-end cavities were prepared to a depth of 3mm using ProUltra surgical ultrasonic tips. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=30): Group 1 - ProRoot MTA (Dentsply/Maillefer) Group 2 - MTA PlusTM (Prevest Denpro Limited) Group 3 – BiodentineTM (Septodont) Group 4 – Permite Amalgam (SDI) The materials were manipulated according to the manufacturer’s instructions and used to fill the root-end cavities. The specimens were then coated with two layers of clear varnish, except the resected apical surface. Teeth were stored in gauze, moistened with Phosphate Buffered Saline for 24 hours and thereafter submerged in Indian Ink dye for 48 hours. The excess dye was rinsed off the specimens under running water. Specimens were then sectioned horizontally in one millimetre increments from the apical end of the root. The extent of dye penetration was measured to the nearest millimetre using a stereomicroscope. Data for different groups was collected and summarised in terms of percentage for the outcome vector (no leak, 1 mm leak, 2 mm leak and 3 mm leak). Furthermore pairwise comparisons between each of the calcium silicate materials to amalgam were done at the 0.017 level of significance, using Fisher’s exact test. Amalgam showed significantly more leakage than the calcium silicate materials (p<0.001). No significant differences were found among the calcium silicate materials, namely, BiodentineTM vs ProRoot (p=0.776), BiodentineTM vs MTA PlusTM (p=0.667) and ProRoot vs MTA PlusTM (p= 0.350). tm2015 Community Dentistry MScDent Unrestricted 2015-07-02T11:06:55Z 2015-07-02T11:06:55Z 2015/04/17 2014 Dissertation Seedat, HC 2014, An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam, MScDent Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46127> A2015 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46127 en © 2015 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title_full An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title_fullStr An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title_full_unstemmed An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title_short An In-vitro Comparison of Microleakage Between Three Calcium Silicate Cements and Amalgam
title_sort in vitro comparison of microleakage between three calcium silicate cements and amalgam
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/46127