Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment

Mini Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Wolff, Ernst
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613654044639232
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Wolff, Ernst
author_browse Wolff, Ernst
author_facet Wolff, Ernst
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/53401
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:39:34.803Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/53401 Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment Wolff, Ernst donduplooy@gmail.com Du Plooy, Donovan UCTD Mini Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015. In the Dialectic of Enlightenment, Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer argue that the Enlightenment is fated to always return to the state of myth which it claims to have escaped from. They attempt to show how the instrumental reason which is present within the Enlightenment has come to dominate over all other forms of reason which leads to the closing off of the possibility that the Enlightenment is able to fulfil its promise of freedom, truth and equality for humankind. However, Jürgen Habermas, a philosopher which shares the same tradition of Critical Theory as Adorno and Horkheimer, counters this claim by undermining the intellectual process which the authors of the Dialectic of Enlightenment used to reach their conclusions. Habermas argues that by utilising a totalising critique of reason in their argument, Adorno and Horkheimer undermine the very rational grounds which their argument is based on and become guilty of a performative contradiction. Habermas attributes this fault in the Dialectic of Enlightenment to the fact that Adorno and Horkheimer followed Friedrich Nietzsche?s criticism of reason too closely and eventually overextended it into an aporia. This dissertation will trace Habermas? critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment by exploring his main arguments. Political Sciences MA Unrestricted 2016-06-27T12:17:25Z 2016-06-27T12:17:25Z 2016-04-19 2015 Mini Dissertation Du Plooy, D 2015, Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment, MA Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53401> A2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53401 en © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title_full Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title_fullStr Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title_full_unstemmed Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title_short Habermas' critique of the Dialectic of Enlightenment
title_sort habermas critique of the dialectic of enlightenment
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53401