Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking

Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Reyburn, Duncan
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613497943130112
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Reyburn, Duncan
author_browse Reyburn, Duncan
author_facet Reyburn, Duncan
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/53427
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:05.780Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/53427 A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking Reyburn, Duncan nicola_lourens@yahoo.com Cassim, Fatima Lourens, Nicola UCTD Design thinking Design methodology Design theory Design practice Human-centred design User-centred design Innovation Innovation management Creative problem solving Design process Humanities theses SDG-04 Humanities theses SDG-09 Humanities theses SDG-12 Dissertation (MA)--University of Pretoria, 2015. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. This study aims to explore the value and values of design thinking as an approach. More specifically, this study interrogates and explores the value and values of characteristics in design thinking. Moreover, this study specifically focuses on and interrogates characteristics identified by Charles Owen and Tim Brown in more detail. An attempt is made to critically discuss preconceived ideas regarding the nature of design thinking as a methodology and process. As a result, the characteristics identified in this study serve as the main point of departure. These inform and guide the study towards an understanding of value and values within design thinking. The understanding of design thinking relies on an understanding of design, but more specifically, the changing nature of design as a discipline and field of study. Therefore, this study begins with a brief history of design praxis, which serves as a foundation for contextualising design thinking. In addition, the history of design covered in this study serves as the foundation on which design thinking itself is based. This study especially seeks to uncover the history and origins of design thinking from various points of view. The history of design thinking is fairly complex, thus the various points of origin assist in a better understanding thereof. These points of origin are critiqued and compared in an attempt to further illuminate the value and values of design thinking as an approach. As a result, the different origins of design thinking are linked to the characteristics identified by Owen (2005a:12-14; 2006a:3-5; 2006b:24-25) and Brown (2008a; 2009a:49-62, 71-77, 85-86), which further communicate the need for value and values in design thinking. In addition, this study investigates various criticisms against design thinking, in an attempt to understand many of the uncertainties surrounding the term. Moreover, the various criticisms are discussed and critiqued in order to build a case for design thinking, as well as the value and values it may add to any future outcome. Lastly, this study briefly explores the ethical values that underpin certain responsibilities within design thinking. Ethics and responsibilities play a key role in any design and design thinking outcome, and are discussed with this in mind. ae2026 Visual Arts MA Unrestricted SDG-04: Quality education SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure SDG-12: Responsible consumption and production 2016-06-27T12:17:36Z 2016-06-27T12:17:36Z 2016-04-13 2015 Dissertation Lourens, N 2015, A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking, MA Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53427> A2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53427 en © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Design thinking
Design methodology
Design theory
Design practice
Human-centred design
User-centred design
Innovation
Innovation management
Creative problem solving
Design process
Humanities theses SDG-04
Humanities theses SDG-09
Humanities theses SDG-12
A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title_full A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title_fullStr A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title_full_unstemmed A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title_short A critique of design thinking : an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
title_sort critique of design thinking an interrogation into the value and values of design thinking
topic UCTD
Design thinking
Design methodology
Design theory
Design practice
Human-centred design
User-centred design
Innovation
Innovation management
Creative problem solving
Design process
Humanities theses SDG-04
Humanities theses SDG-09
Humanities theses SDG-12
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53427