Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries

Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2016.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613470516576256
access_status_str Open Access
author2 De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
author_browse De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
author_facet De Kock, Henrietta Letitia
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2016.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/57247
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:39.766Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/57247 Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries De Kock, Henrietta Letitia u12344789@tuks.co.za Dada, Shakila Kamdem Mademgne, Joseph Dorys UCTD Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2016. Conventional consumer sensory methods take literacy and language capabilities for granted. Consumers with low-literacy levels are considered as people lacking reading proficiency to fill out basic forms or read simple instructions. The conventional format of the paired preference test requires participants to read instructions and indicate which one of two samples is preferred. The first objective of the project was to develop formulations for two ginger biscuits that differed perceptibly but subtly in salt content only to use as test materials for paired preference test trials using consumers with low-literacy levels. The signal biscuit contained 0.65% salt on a flour basis and the high salt biscuit contained 4.54%. Physicochemical analysis showed that the two biscuits were significantly different in total carbohydrate, moisture, ash, protein, fat and Na+ contents as well as texture by instrumental analysis. However, biscuits weren t different in terms of their colour values. Sensory analysis revealed that the high salt biscuit was perceptibly more salty compared to the signal biscuit, but not different in hardness in contrast to the instrumental analysis. An untrained panel of literate student participants preferred the signal biscuit over the high salt biscuit. The second objective was to develop variations of the conventional paired preference method and to determine the effects of variations of the basic elements of the method on task performance by low-literate consumers. Seven individual paired preference tests were carried out at seven different test stations using 50 participants per method. The conventional method was less efficient and time-consuming with a mean time of 5.6 min taken per participant. The efficiency of the paired preference method was improved to an extent that almost no assistance was needed and the mean time to complete the test was 4.2 min with the modify methods. Participants performing the test claimed that, combination of audio and picture instructions positively influence their performance and improved understanding of test instructions. For the conventional paired preference test, 34% of participants struggled to follow the test instructions and only 52% of participants appeared confident with the procedure. For the method with limited reading and writing requirements, only 16% of participants struggled to follow the instructions and 84% appeared confident with the procedure. Basic elements developed associated to instruction to pull the coding sticker from the sample chosen to stick it on a positive smiling face was identified as the best paired preference method for independent completion by low-literate consumers. tm2016 Food Science MSc Unrestricted 2016-10-14T07:32:52Z 2016-10-14T07:32:52Z 2016-09-01 2016 Dissertation Kamdem Mademgne, JD 2016, Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries, MSc Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57247> S2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57247 en © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title_full Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title_fullStr Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title_short Developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low-literacy levels applicable in developing countries
title_sort developing sensory evaluation methods for consumers with low literacy levels applicable in developing countries
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57247