Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies

Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613548821086208
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
author_browse Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
author_facet Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960-
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/62543
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:54.123Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/62543 A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies Carstens, Pieter Albert, 1960- timmie.laurens@gmail.com Laurens, Johannes Bernardus UCTD Regenerative Medicine Stem Cell Regulation National Health Act Human Tissue Authority Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017. Stem cell technologies as a branch of regenerative medicine are becoming increasingly popular as the science behind it evolves. Therefore, it is important that the regulatory framework pertaining to stem cell technologies be well defined and appropriate to prevent unethical and unscrupulous behaviour on the part of medical practitioners, which gives rise to stem cell tourism. South African legislation pertaining to stem cell technology is regarded as inadequate and dissonant with the Constitution, exacerbating the problem of stem cell tourism and denying patients access to certain stem cell therapies, which ultimately can be viewed as an infringement of their constitutional rights. The United Kingdom (UK) provides a clear-cut regulatory framework, which is not only centred around consent and patient safety but is also conducive to production of stem cell therapies. For such reasons, this dissertation finds the UK framework to be an appropriate benchmark against which the South African regulatory framework can be evaluated. By means of comparison and elaborating on the biology of stem cells in addition to pertinent ethical principles, legislation and human rights of both South Africa and the UK, an argument will be made out that South African legislation pertaining to stem cell therapy and related matters is wanting. Furthermore, analysis will be made of the definition of biological medicine as put forward by the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965 to conclude that certain stem cell therapies are best excluded from such a definition as such stringent requirements and protocols encumbers access to stem cell therapies and inflates costs. Lastly, remedial measures are proposed to remedy these injustices by proposing for the institution of a specialist adivisary committee to oversee stem cell and related activities. Key Words: Regenerative Medicine; Stem Cells; Stem Cell Regulation; National Health Act; Medicines and Related Substances Control Act; Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product; Human Tissue Authority; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; HTA; HFEA; Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency; MHRA; European Medicines Agency; Tissue-engineered Products; Doctor-Patient Relationship; Medical Innovation Bill 2014; Experimental Treatments; Innovative Therapy; Hospital Exemption; Informed Consent; Special Exemption; Autologous Stem Cell Therapy; Stem Cell Transplants; Gene Therapy Advisory Committee. Public Law LLM Unrestricted 2017-09-29T07:14:04Z 2017-09-29T07:14:04Z 2017-09-06 2017 Dissertation Laurens, JB 2017, A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies, LLM Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62543> S2017 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62543 en © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Regenerative Medicine
Stem Cell Regulation
National Health Act
Human Tissue Authority
A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title_full A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title_short A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
title_sort comparative analysis of the regulatory framework of the therapeutic application of stem cell technologies
topic UCTD
Regenerative Medicine
Stem Cell Regulation
National Health Act
Human Tissue Authority
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62543