Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law

Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Roestoff, Melanie
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613722461077504
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Roestoff, Melanie
author_browse Roestoff, Melanie
author_facet Roestoff, Melanie
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/62544
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:40.078Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/62544 The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law Roestoff, Melanie ntsaneles@gmail.com Lesenyeho, Ntsane Kenneth UCTD Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017. This dissertation is an investigation into the constitutionality of the requirement of advantage to creditors in South African consumer insolvency law as well as a comparative investigation into debt relief procedures available to consumer debtors in Australia and England. The dissertation identifies and discusses debt relief procedures available in South African consumer insolvency law namely sequestration, debt review and administration. The author suggests that these procedures do not provide adequate relief as it does not provide a debt discharge for "poor" debtors, that is debtors who do not have any assets or income (the so-called "No Income No Assets" (NINA) group of debtors) available for distribution amongst creditors. The author discusses the possible unconstitutionality of the advantage for creditors requirement in light of the creditor oriented approach of the South African insolvency system. In this regard the test that was applied in the famous constitutional court decision in Harken v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 CC, will be analysed in order to determine the possible violation of the right of equality enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. The comparative study entails an investigation of certain key issues namely the availability of alternative debt relief procedures and in particular how both countries deal with debt discharge for poor debtors. Ultimately, two sets of conclusions are drawn from the investigation in this dissertation. Firstly, it is concluded that the requirement of advantage to creditors is unconstitutional and should be removed as a provision under the consumer insolvency law. Secondly it is submitted that the South African Reform Commission should learn from developments in English and Australian consumer insolvency law and should reconsider alternative and appropriate debt discharge procedures for debtors, especially "poor" debtors who cannot reasonably repay their creditors. Mercantile Law LLM Unrestricted 2017-09-29T07:14:04Z 2017-09-29T07:14:04Z 2017-09-06 2017 Mini Dissertation Lesenyeho, NK 2017, The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62544> S2017 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62544 en © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title_full The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title_fullStr The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title_full_unstemmed The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title_short The constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in Insolvency Law
title_sort constitutionality of the advantage to creditors required and a comparative investigation in insolvency law
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62544