Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa

Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia)
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613520187621376
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia)
author_browse Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia)
author_facet Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia)
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/73233
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:27.084Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/73233 Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia) carike.taute@sasol.com Taute, Carike UCTD Competition law Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019. South Africa has joined many other jurisdictions in criminalizing cartel conduct when it legislated criminal sanctions in the form of Section 73A of the Competition Act. The section clearly differentiates between Competition Law authorities being responsible for competition law and the National Prosecution Authority being responsible for criminal prosecutions, while failing to set any specific guidance on the coordination required between the two authorities to ensure efficient prosecutions. The Competition Commission has had years of success in the identification and dismantling of cartels, and in so doing have been able to support South Africa’s Competition Legislation which aim to promote economic efficiency, adaptability and development. Section 73A, and its lack of clarity on specifically leniency and the ability of the Competition Commission to offer immunity against prosecution, has the ability to derail the successes of the one tool with a proven track record against cartels: the Corporate Leniency Policy. The Corporate Leniency Policy is still an uncodified policy applied by the Competition Commission to entice cartelist to expose cartel conduct in exchange for leniency. A review of the co-existence of leniency programs with criminal sanctions in other jurisdictions will show that the UK and Australia have found it equally difficult to manage the cooperation between different and independent authorities responsible for competition law enforcement and criminal law enforcement respectively, and in the process have hardly criminally prosecuted any cartel conduct. It is argued that the Corporate Leniency Policy provides effective and currently successful combat against cartels, but that the unclear and uncertain provisions of Section 73A could pose a threat to successful detection and eradication of cartels in the future, unless some expansions in a codification of the Corporate Leniency Policy is done, or specific coordination between the Competition authorities and the National Prosecuting Authority is done. Mercantile Law LLM Unrestricted 2020-02-12T06:50:59Z 2020-02-12T06:50:59Z 2020-04-09 2019 Mini Dissertation * A2020 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73233 en © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Competition law
Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title_full Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title_fullStr Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title_short Haste makes waste : how curtailed implementation of section 73A of the competition Act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in South Africa
title_sort haste makes waste how curtailed implementation of section 73a of the competition act 89 of 1998 could derail the aims and policy goals of competition law in south africa
topic UCTD
Competition law
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73233