Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution

Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Muller, Gustav
Format: Thesis
Language:en_US
Published: University of Pretoria 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613577959964672
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Muller, Gustav
author_browse Muller, Gustav
author_facet Muller, Gustav
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/76683
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language en_US
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:38:22.209Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/76683 An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution Muller, Gustav u17159998@tuks.co.za Kulundu, Kenneth Wanyama UCTD Property law Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020. This thesis argues that the implementation of inclusionary housing in South African law will affect property rights in the form of landownership and expected earnings. By invoking the non-arbitrariness test that was adopted by the Constitutional Court in the FNB decision, the thesis illustrates that the factors mentioned in the non-arbitrariness test can be used to understand the scope of the state’s obligations in fulfilling the right of access to adequate housing. The symbiotic nature of the relationship between the right to property (section 25) and the right of access to adequate housing (section 26) is therefore underscored. In drawing this link, I rely on the principle of spatial justice that is enshrined in the Spatial Planning and Land Use management Act (SPLUMA) to show that the implementation of inclusionary housing requires a more inclusive reading of spatial justice than what the Act envisages. I argue that to effectively implement inclusionary housing, the owner’s right to exploit property for economic benefit should be balanced by a housing beneficiary’s right to well-located, affordable housing. While the South African legal response to the problem of homelessness has emphasized affordability of housing, location has largely been overlooked. To satisfy the non-arbitrariness test for the deprivation of property rights, it must be shown that the imposition of inclusionary housing requirements on property developers will lead to housing that is both affordable and well located. Appropriate building and rent regulation measures can lead to affordable and well located housing in the South African legal context, but only if these measures recognize that a developer is not ordinarily entitled to the most profitable use of her property. As currently conceptualized, the principle of spatial justice in SPLUMA gives owners excessive protection against state interference with their property rights by insisting that the spatial justice principle must be read together with the principles of sustainability and effectiveness. The thesis concludes that SPLUMA nevertheless lays a foundation for the implementation of inclusionary housing in South Africa because it requires municipalities to include crucial information (such as estimates of the level of unemployment, family sizes and expected economic activity) in their Municipal Spatial Development Frameworks (MSDFs). MSDFs will play the role of providing sufficient reason for regulating developers’ property rights (especially the right to exploit property for economic benefit) in line with the idea of substantive non-arbitrariness envisaged in FNB Private Law LLD Unrestricted 2020-11-03T14:12:09Z 2020-11-03T14:12:09Z 2020 2020 Thesis Kulundu, KW 2020, An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution, LLD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/76683> D2020 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/76683 en_US © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Property law
An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title_full An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title_fullStr An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title_full_unstemmed An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title_short An inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice : location, affordability, and the South African Constitution
title_sort inclusionary housing perspective on spatial justice location affordability and the south african constitution
topic UCTD
Property law
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/76683