Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods

Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2020.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Fletcher, Lizelle
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613717588344832
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Fletcher, Lizelle
author_browse Fletcher, Lizelle
author_facet Fletcher, Lizelle
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2020.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/77378
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:35.305Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/77378 Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods Fletcher, Lizelle mxo.msibi@gmail.com Msibi, Mxolisi Mathematical Statistics conditional independence propensity score counterfactual UCTD Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2020. Adjusting for baseline pre-intervention characteristics between treatment groups, through the use of propensity score matching methods, is an important step that enables researchers to do causal inference with confidence. This is critical, largely, due to the fact that practical treatment allocation scenarios are non-randomized in nature, with various inherent biases that are inevitable, and therefore requiring such experimental manipulations. These propensity score matching methods are the available tools to be used as control mechanisms, for such intrinsic system biases in causal studies, without the benefits of randomization (Lane, To, Kyna , & Robin, 2012). Certain assumptions need to be verifiable or met, before one may embark on a propensity score matching causal effects journey, using the Rubin causal model (Holland, 1986), of which the main ones are conditional independence (unconfoundedness) and common support (positivity). In particular, with this dissertation we are concerned with elaborating the applications of these matching methods, for a ‘strong-ignorability’ case (Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983), i.e. when both the overlap and unconfoundedness properties are valid. We will take a journey from explaining different experimental designs and how the treatment effect is estimated, closing with a practical example based on two cohorts of enrolled introductory statistics students prior and post-clickers intervention, at a public South African university, and the relevant causal conclusions thereof. Keywords: treatment, conditional independence, propensity score, counterfactual, confounder, common support Statistics MSc Unrestricted 2020-12-15T09:58:56Z 2020-12-15T09:58:56Z 2021 2020 Dissertation * A2021 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77378 en © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Mathematical Statistics
conditional independence
propensity score
counterfactual
UCTD
Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title_full Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title_fullStr Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title_full_unstemmed Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title_short Causal Inference : controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
title_sort causal inference controlling for bias in observational studies using propensity score methods
topic Mathematical Statistics
conditional independence
propensity score
counterfactual
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77378