Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Is the ambit of judicial review in South Africa properly guarded to ensure that judges do not (ab)use it to the extent of replacing constitutional supremacy with judicial supremacy?
Mini Dissertation (LLM (Constitutional and Administrative Law))--University of Pretoria, 2021.
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Is the ambit of judicial review in South Africa properly guarded to ensure that judges do not (ab)use it to the extent of replacing constitutional supremacy with judicial supremacy?
- Civil supremacy of the military in Namibia : an evolutionary perspective
- The Great Decoupling: China, America and the Struggle for Technological Supremacy
- Civilian supremacy over the military [Microfiche] : guidelines for embryonic democracies
- Who should judges be in a transforming society? An analysis of the constitutional requirements for judicial selection in South Africa
- Correcting Confusion Over Commandeering, Supremacy, and Preemption: A User’s Guide to Modern Federalism
- Judicial activism in South Afica's Constitutional Court : minority protection or judicial illegitimacy?