Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation

Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Skelton, Ann, 1961-
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613614720942080
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Skelton, Ann, 1961-
author_browse Skelton, Ann, 1961-
author_facet Skelton, Ann, 1961-
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/80291
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:38:57.201Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/80291 Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation Skelton, Ann, 1961- lorette.arendse@up.ac.za Arendse, Lorette UCTD Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2020. The purpose of this thesis is to critically evaluate the South African courts’ role in contributing to the radical transformation of public basic education which is mandated by the South African Constitution. The author observes that deeply rooted patterns of racial and class inequality, that developed over a span of four centuries of colonial and apartheid rule, are reproduced in the post-apartheid public basic education system. This disparity manifests as unequal access to quality basic education for the majority of black and poor learners in the post-1994 dispensation. It is contended that the substantive-based approach to the right to basic education by the High courts and Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has led to some transformative change in public education. However, this approach is only half the battle won because it does not address the engrained patterns of systemic inequality perpetuated by school governing bodies (SGBs) of former white/Model C schools. In this regard, it is argued that governing bodies of former Model C schools manipulate the autonomous legislative powers awarded to SGBs with the purpose of retaining their inherited privilege(s). Whenever the state has challenged these schools’ utilisation of their policy-making autonomy, the school governing bodies have had recourse to the courts. As a result, a contentious relationship between SGBs of former white schools and provincial education departments has developed in the sphere of public schooling. Apart from contextualising the historical and contemporary inequality in basic education as well as analysing the transformative potential of the substantive-based approach of the High courts and SCA, this thesis focuses on the Constitutional Court’s resolution of the acrimonious disputes between the government and former white schools. The author notes with concern the development of an approach by South Africa’s apex Court rooted in the notion of “meaningful engagement”. The application of meaningful engagement entails that the Court does not resolve the dispute before it, but requires of the SGBs and the state to engage with each other and settle the matter. The Court has classified meaningful engagement as the required procedure through which all education disputes must be resolved. In this regard, the author argues that the Constitutional Court’s perfunctory application of meaningful engagement has hampered the Court’s ability to deal effectively with the underlying “hard” issue of structural inequality which permeates the education system. Accordingly, the study concludes that the meaningful engagement approach threatens the radical transformation of the public basic education system. National Research Foundation (NRF) Jurisprudence LLD Unrestricted 2021-06-11T13:00:53Z 2021-06-11T13:00:53Z 2020 2020 Thesis Arendse, L 2020, Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation, LLD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80291> S2020 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80291 en © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title_full Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title_fullStr Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title_full_unstemmed Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title_short Inequality in the public basic education system: the role of the South African courts in effecting radical transformation
title_sort inequality in the public basic education system the role of the south african courts in effecting radical transformation
topic UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80291