Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape

Mini Dissertation (MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2021.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Mungatana, Eric D.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613440485359616
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Mungatana, Eric D.
author_browse Mungatana, Eric D.
author_facet Mungatana, Eric D.
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2021.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/83679
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:11.018Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/83679 Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape Mungatana, Eric D. hluksman@gmail.com Mandla, Hlumani UCTD Agricultural innovations Mini Dissertation (MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2021. The study uses cross-sectional data to test whether FSPs improve technical efficiencies (TEs) of smallholder maize farmers. Using plot level data collected from 30 FSP and 66 non-FSP farmers drawn from Mgojweni, Mabetshe, Lujecweni, Bantingville, Canzibe and Dumasi villages of the Eastern Cape, this study estimates a Cobb-Douglas stochastic production frontier and uses it to compare the efficiency scores of the two farmer types. The results show that FSP adopters had relatively higher TE scores, with over 50% having scores of above 70%. However, a t-test for equality of mean TE scores revealed no statistically significant differences between them (t=-1.3969, p=0.1662), suggesting that the FSPs cannot explain the TE variances. Given that participation in FSPs was not random, a propensity score matching techniques was used to account for self-selection bias. After accounting for self-selection bias the results revealed that FSP adopters were on average 205% more efficient relative to non-adopters. These results underscore the importance of accounting for self-selection bias in demonstrating the impact of agricultural innovations. Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics) Unrestricted 2022-02-08T09:54:01Z 2022-02-08T09:54:01Z 2022-04 2021 Mini Dissertation * A2022 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/83679 en © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Agricultural innovations
Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title_full Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title_fullStr Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title_short Accounting for self-selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations : the case of farmer support programs in the Eastern Cape
title_sort accounting for self selection bias in assessing impacts of agricultural innovations the case of farmer support programs in the eastern cape
topic UCTD
Agricultural innovations
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/83679