Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts

Thesis (LLD (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2021.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Tladi, Dire
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613498981220352
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Tladi, Dire
author_browse Tladi, Dire
author_facet Tladi, Dire
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (LLD (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2021.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/86639
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:06.816Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/86639 Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts Tladi, Dire linga.jr@gmail.com Linga, Ahmed UCTD International law International criminal law Special regimes Norms conflict Treaty interpretation Rome statute Law articles SDG-16 Law articles SDG-17 Thesis (LLD (Public Law))--University of Pretoria, 2021. On the facets of legal regimes, normative conflicts and the resulting legal fragmentation of international law, International Criminal Law (ICL) field has been analysed in the present study in order to determine whether this field is a type of special legal regime that can contribute to the international law‘s normative conflict. The study has specifically identified two indispensable international law tools for addressing an emerged normative conflict that involves the ICL statute rule and the customary international law rule. These tools are: a) the treaty interpretation rules prescribed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, and b) the rules‘ application technique viz. the legal principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali (translated in English as: special law prevails over general law). The potentiality of these tools has been elaborated in the study vis-à-vis the judicial addressing of normative conflicts whereas the controversial provisions of Article 27(2) and Article 98(1) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998 seem to contradict the customary rule on immunity. This normative conflict has been presumed in both the scholarly debates and legal contentions over the applicability of pre-existing state officials’ immunity before an international court with jurisdiction. To this end, the study has tested the hypothesis of whether the said conflict is typical, and whether the International Criminal Court‘s chambers have employed or ought to have employed the abovementioned legal tools in addressing such conflict. Supposedly, if a normative conflict becomes severe, it leads to a legal fragmentation problem. rz2025 Public Law LLD (Public Law) Unrestricted SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals 2022-08-02T08:38:35Z 2022-08-02T08:38:35Z 2022-09-08 2021 Thesis * https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86639 en © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
International law
International criminal law
Special regimes
Norms conflict
Treaty interpretation
Rome statute
Law articles SDG-16
Law articles SDG-17
Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title_full Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title_fullStr Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title_short Treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts : applying the methodology to ICC Statute Conflicts
title_sort treaty interpretation and other tools for normative conflicts applying the methodology to icc statute conflicts
topic UCTD
International law
International criminal law
Special regimes
Norms conflict
Treaty interpretation
Rome statute
Law articles SDG-16
Law articles SDG-17
url https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86639