Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)

Dissertation (MA (Digital Culture and Media))--University of Pretoria, 2022.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Du Plessis, Rory
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613707666718720
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Du Plessis, Rory
author_browse Du Plessis, Rory
author_facet Du Plessis, Rory
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MA (Digital Culture and Media))--University of Pretoria, 2022.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/88993
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:25.890Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/88993 A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018) Du Plessis, Rory hchris1985@gmail.com Maas, Hendrik Christiaan UCTD The South African Border War Kanarie Moffie Hegemony Religious superiority Nationalism Hegemonic discourses of hetero-patriarchy Heroism Heteronormativity Patriarchy Militarism White supremacy LGBTQI Dissertation (MA (Digital Culture and Media))--University of Pretoria, 2022. The study focuses on two contemporary LGBTQI films that were periodised during the South African Border War: Kanarie (Olwagen 2018) and Moffie (Hermanus 2019) with the aim to identify myths prevalent in their visual representation. The dissertation argues that in order for toxic mythology to be subverted, a process of queering must unfold. Julie Reid offers an important insight with regard to the ethical value of myth. To Reid (2011:344) “myth … carries the risk of inciting damaging social action [that] validates the critical analysis of myth, especially in terms of the ethical nature of its content”. In the study, these beliefs or myths include hegemony, religious superiority, nationalism, hegemonic discourses of hetero-patriarchy, heroism, patriarchy, white supremacy, militarism and heteronormativity. These myths are toxic in their nature. The study examines the prevalence of these myths in visual culture during the War and then identifies them in the two films. This is done in order to find whether Moffie and Kanarie are LGBTQI cinematic products that show progression from the antedating myths of the War era films, as well as to identify other visual representations that were produced during this time. The analysis adopts Queer Theory as well as Barthesian semiotics to arrive at the conclusion that, for the most part, Moffie and Kanarie still serve mythology that is unrelatable to the social and political context of post-apartheid South Africa. These myths are only consumed by a particular faction of South African society. Moreover, their production is unethical given the responsibility that producers and artists have to not perpetuate toxic myths but rather queer them. This is especially important since it is insufficient simply to present alternative figures such as homosexuals visually in order to satisfy a supposed liberal product. On the contrary, the representation of homosexuality is not liberal at all if gay figures still conform to toxic myths of masculinity. iii It is crucial that, if gay figures are represented, their representation should queer the myths that suppressed them in the first place. Otherwise, their inclusion is inconsequential and meaningless. It is thus disappointing that Moffie and Kanarie, for the most part, subscribe to the aforementioned myths in their visual representation of gay figures to satisfy the kind of mythology with which audiences are, sadly, familiar. Visual Arts MA (Digital Culture and Media) Unrestricted 2023-01-27T07:41:36Z 2023-01-27T07:41:36Z 2023-04 2022 Dissertation * A2023 https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88993 en © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
The South African Border War
Kanarie
Moffie
Hegemony
Religious superiority
Nationalism
Hegemonic discourses of hetero-patriarchy
Heroism
Heteronormativity
Patriarchy
Militarism
White supremacy
LGBTQI
A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title_full A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title_fullStr A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title_full_unstemmed A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title_short A critical reading of the myths in Oliver Hermanus’s Moffie (2019) and Christiaan Olwagen’s Kanarie (2018)
title_sort critical reading of the myths in oliver hermanus s moffie 2019 and christiaan olwagen s kanarie 2018
topic UCTD
The South African Border War
Kanarie
Moffie
Hegemony
Religious superiority
Nationalism
Hegemonic discourses of hetero-patriarchy
Heroism
Heteronormativity
Patriarchy
Militarism
White supremacy
LGBTQI
url https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88993