Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)

Mini Dissertation (MA (Diplomatic Studies))--University of Pretoria, 2022.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Igba, Samuel Ajogwu
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613439556321280
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Igba, Samuel Ajogwu
author_browse Igba, Samuel Ajogwu
author_facet Igba, Samuel Ajogwu
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (MA (Diplomatic Studies))--University of Pretoria, 2022.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/89146
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:10.076Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/89146 Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006) Igba, Samuel Ajogwu tshenolomatlala@gmail.com Wielenga, Cori Matlala, Tshenolo UCTD Decoloniality Decolonial peace Deadline Diplomacy Darfur African Union Mini Dissertation (MA (Diplomatic Studies))--University of Pretoria, 2022. The Darfur crisis persists to the present day despite the African Union’s (AU) intervention. This mini-dissertation analyses the failure of the AU’s mediation in Darfur from 2004 to 2006. It uses a decolonial lens to investigate: how and why deadline diplomacy guided the mediation efforts by the AU, how the AU addressed the colonial legacy of Darfur during the mediation, and the consequences of the absence of multi-track diplomacy in Darfur. The key findings are that the AU had initially followed a classic integrative approach to their mediation at the beginning of the negotiations, but was coerced by their external donors to use deadline diplomacy in April 2006, to conclude the talks (known as the Abuja peace process) and settle the crisis with the signing of an agreement. This reduced the mediation process to the signing of a document that has never been implemented. The AU’s understanding of the colonial underpinnings of the conflict was limited. The AU mainly focused on settling the current conflict on the ground, which was propagated as being ethnically-charged by the Sudanese government and the international community. This created an arbitrary understanding of the complexities of Darfurian society. The AU only utilised track 1 diplomacy and did not utilise the other tracks of the multi-track system, which created a distance between the negotiations at the table and the realities and interests of the local population on the ground. The AU’s mediation in Darfur is characterised by the prioritising of the signing of the Darfur Peace Agreement and a disconnect between the interests of the Darfurian people and the interests of the parties involved in the negotiations. It may be concluded that the lack of financial capacity of the AU, the reliance on external funding, and the use of the same problem-solving mediation method employed by the West weakens the implementation of any solutions that are proposed, by Africans for Africans. It is recommended that the mediation process in Darfur needs to be more inclusive. Civil society, women’s groups, religious leaders, NGOs, and politicians outside of the Darfurian government (the opposition) should be included in the mediation process as their participation would not only increase the legitimacy of the mediation process but would also ensure that the official mediation team are well-informed about the concerns of the affected local population. Political Sciences MA (Diplomatic Studies) Unrestricted 2023-02-03T13:18:18Z 2023-02-03T13:18:18Z 2023-05-03 2022 Mini Dissertation * A2023 https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89146 hhtps://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.21960665 en © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Decoloniality
Decolonial peace
Deadline Diplomacy
Darfur
African Union
Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title_full Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title_fullStr Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title_full_unstemmed Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title_short Saying it right, doing it wrong : an analysis of the failure of the African Union’s mediation in Darfur (2004-2006)
title_sort saying it right doing it wrong an analysis of the failure of the african union s mediation in darfur 2004 2006
topic UCTD
Decoloniality
Decolonial peace
Deadline Diplomacy
Darfur
African Union
url https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89146