Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication

Mini Dissertation (LLM (Constitutional and Administrative Law))--University of Pretoria, 2023.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Murcott, Melanie
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613610865328128
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Murcott, Melanie
author_browse Murcott, Melanie
author_facet Murcott, Melanie
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (LLM (Constitutional and Administrative Law))--University of Pretoria, 2023.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/89947
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:38:53.515Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/89947 A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication Murcott, Melanie felixleroux29@gmail.com Le Roux, Felix Rudolph Transfromative Adjudication Self-Review Promotion of Administrative Justice Act Judicial Deference Variability UCTD Mini Dissertation (LLM (Constitutional and Administrative Law))--University of Pretoria, 2023. This dissertation seeks to answer the question whether a critical analysis of the Constitutional Court’s judgment in State Information Technology Agency SOC Limited v Gijima Holdings (Gijima CC), with reference to a method of judicial reasoning known as transformative adjudication and the related concepts of judicial deference and variability, reveals that the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) ought to be the basis of review in cases where the state applies for the review of its own administrative action. Section 33(3)(a) of the Constitution stipulates that national legislation must be enacted to provide for the judicial review of a particular type of public power called administrative action. The legislation thus enacted is PAJA. Therefore, one would expect that PAJA is the appropriate basis of review in cases where the state applies for the review of its own administrative action. However, in Gijima CC the Constitutional Court held that the state is not a bearer of administrative justice rights in terms of section 33 of the Constitution. Consequently, the state may not apply for the review of its own administrative action under PAJA, the statute giving effect to section 33 of the Constitution. The principle of legality, which imposes less rigorous standards of scrutiny than PAJA, is now the only basis of review available in so-called “self-review” cases. This dissertation critiques the reasoning of the Constitutional Court and considers the broader impact of its decision in Gijima CC through the lens of transformative adjudication. Furthermore, this dissertation argues that PAJA ought to be applied in cases where the state reviews its own administrative action and that the concepts of judicial deference and variability allow for ample flexibility in the application of PAJA during judicial review, including self-reviews. Public Law LLM (Constitutional and Administrative Law) Unrestricted 2023-03-03T06:13:50Z 2023-03-03T06:13:50Z 2023-05-15 2023 Mini Dissertation * A2023 https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89947 en © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Transfromative Adjudication
Self-Review
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act
Judicial Deference
Variability
UCTD
A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title_full A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title_fullStr A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title_full_unstemmed A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title_short A critical analysis of self-review through the lens of transformative adjudication
title_sort critical analysis of self review through the lens of transformative adjudication
topic Transfromative Adjudication
Self-Review
Promotion of Administrative Justice Act
Judicial Deference
Variability
UCTD
url https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89947