Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand

Mini Dissertation (MCom (Taxation))--University of Pretoria, 2021.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Pidduck, Teresa
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613636255547392
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Pidduck, Teresa
author_browse Pidduck, Teresa
author_facet Pidduck, Teresa
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Mini Dissertation (MCom (Taxation))--University of Pretoria, 2021.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/93783
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:39:17.781Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/93783 The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand Pidduck, Teresa michellekirsten0@gmail.com Kirsten, Michelle UCTD Taxation South Africa New Zealand General Anti-avoidance Rules Impermissible Avoidance Agreement Tax Avoidance Mini Dissertation (MCom (Taxation))--University of Pretoria, 2021. The general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) has been adopted by South Africa as one of its methods to combat tax avoidance schemes into which taxpayers enter. Since 1941 when the South African GAAR was first introduced into the tax legislation, it has been amended various times as a result of the weaknesses that were highlighted by its failures to stand up to the rigours of the courts. However, since the most recent amendment to the South African GAAR in 2006, its efficacy remains unknown due to the fact that it has not been tested by the courts in its entirety. This study aims to address this concern by determining the effectiveness of the South African GAAR when compared to its New Zealand counterpart. This study employed a ‘structured pre-emptive analysis’ research methodology, which is a combination of doctrinal and reform-oriented approaches. The doctrinal approach was used in Phase 1 of the research whereby a doctrinal analysis of the South African and New Zealand GAARs were performed. This approach allowed an understanding of the interpretation and application of the two GAARs to be obtained, as well as to allow for the identification of weaknesses in the South African GAAR, while simultaneously making suggestions for improvement. The reform-oriented approach was used in Phase 2 of the study in which the South African GAAR was applied to the facts of a case from New Zealand. Phase 3 of the study contained the triangulation of the findings from both Phases 1 and 2 of the study, thereby validating the findings of the study. The findings from Phases 1 and 2 highlighted various weaknesses that exist in the South African GAAR which indicate that additional guidance should be provided to address the existing uncertainties currently contained within the interpretation and application, in order to prevent inconsistencies that may limit its efficacy. The findings of this study indicate that for a taxpayer to be considered party to an arrangement, they do not need to be aware of the entire arrangement nor all of its details. Furthermore, it was noted that the sole or main purpose requirement should be amended to rather require that obtaining the tax benefit was one of the purposes, provided it is not merely incidental, as opposed to requiring the tax benefit to be the sole or main purpose of the arrangement. In addition, it is suggested that the sole or main purpose test be amended to being a purely objective test and not considering subjective intent of the taxpayer. Taxation MCom (Taxation) Unrestricted Faculty of Economic And Management Sciences 2023-12-14T07:29:51Z 2023-12-14T07:29:51Z 2022-05-10 2021-08-31 Mini Dissertation * A2022 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/93783 en © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Taxation
South Africa
New Zealand
General Anti-avoidance Rules
Impermissible Avoidance Agreement
Tax Avoidance
The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title_full The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title_fullStr The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title_short The efficacy of the South African general anti-avoidance rule : using lessons from New Zealand
title_sort efficacy of the south african general anti avoidance rule using lessons from new zealand
topic UCTD
Taxation
South Africa
New Zealand
General Anti-avoidance Rules
Impermissible Avoidance Agreement
Tax Avoidance
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/93783