Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice

Dissertation (MTh (Dogmatics and Christian Ethics))--University of Pretoria, 2023.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Veldsman, Daniel Petrus
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613490651332608
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Veldsman, Daniel Petrus
author_browse Veldsman, Daniel Petrus
author_facet Veldsman, Daniel Petrus
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MTh (Dogmatics and Christian Ethics))--University of Pretoria, 2023.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/94438
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:58.812Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/94438 The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice Veldsman, Daniel Petrus Rist.troy10@gmail.com Rist, Troy UCTD Penal substitution Non-necessitarianism Divine justice Kingdom of God Distributive justice Procedural justice Retributive justice Dissertation (MTh (Dogmatics and Christian Ethics))--University of Pretoria, 2023. Penal substitution has been explored in detail both within the areas of theology and philosophy. Its understanding and application of justice has been a focal point of objection for many. While often understood in purely retributive terms, there is scope to analyse its coherence with divine justice in a more comprehensive biblical manner. This systematic-theological study explores whether the Reformation atonement theory of penal substitution is coherent with divine justice. There are three objections to consider that challenge this coherence: the Reformers understanding and application of divine justice was influenced by their cultural legal context instead of being directed by scripture; penal substitution is self-contradictory as it both attempts to uphold positive retributivism (through its focus on punishing the guilty) while also contradicting negative retributivism (Jesus was innocent yet punished); penal substitution reduces divine justice to purely retributive terms. Firstly, a threefold approach is utilised to identify a broad overview of divine justice: four theories of justice within contemporary philosophy are identified and four OT narratives are analysed to determine their use/application; an exploration of OT and NT justice terms; divine justice and its wider structure within the kingdom of God motif. Secondly, an analysis of selected Reformers to determine their understanding of penal substitution as well as the place and application of divine justice within their atonement thinking. Lastly, an evaluative discussion assesses whether the Reformation atonement theory of penal substitution is coherent with divine justice in light of the findings of the previous two sections. Three observations are made: firstly, the Reformers had a clear scriptural basis for understanding retributive justice to be an essential element of divine justice. Secondly, implicit within their thinking and available within their environment are the necessary concepts to address the supposed self-contradiction within penal substitution. Thirdly, clarifying methodology such as “doctrine”, “metaphor”, “theory”, and “motif”, the kaleidoscopic view, and the epistemological presuppositions, can prevent penal substitution from being reductive in its understanding and application of divine justice. It is therefore possible to conclude that penal substitution is coherent with divine justice. Dogmatics and Christian Ethics MTh (Dogmatics and Christian Ethics) Unrestricted Faculty of Theology and Religion 2024-02-12T06:31:17Z 2024-02-12T06:31:17Z 2024-04-23 2023 Dissertation * A2024 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94438 en © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle UCTD
Penal substitution
Non-necessitarianism
Divine justice
Kingdom of God
Distributive justice
Procedural justice
Retributive justice
The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title_full The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title_fullStr The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title_full_unstemmed The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title_short The reformation atonement theory of penal substitution : a systematic-theological study of its coherence with divine justice
title_sort reformation atonement theory of penal substitution a systematic theological study of its coherence with divine justice
topic UCTD
Penal substitution
Non-necessitarianism
Divine justice
Kingdom of God
Distributive justice
Procedural justice
Retributive justice
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94438