Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field

Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2024.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahomva, Blessing
Other Authors: Barnard, Helena
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613660899180544
access_status_str Open Access
author Mahomva, Blessing
author2 Barnard, Helena
author_browse Barnard, Helena
Mahomva, Blessing
author_facet Barnard, Helena
Mahomva, Blessing
author_sort Mahomva, Blessing
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria.
description Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2024.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/98410
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:39:41.079Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/98410 Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field Mahomva, Blessing Barnard, Helena Distance Transnational Organisational Field Neo-institutional Theory Field Theory UCTD Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2024. Understanding distance and how it functions is critical for international business research. Anchored on the theoretical work arguing that business should be conceptualised as taking place in institutional fields, this study contributes to the distance debate which seeks to extend the conceptualisation of distance beyond the dyadic view. I argue that the dyadic conceptualisation of distance is inadequate to explain organisational outcomes in transnational organisational fields. The field theory suggests that actors exist within a field or social space, where they are oriented towards one another over a common issue or goal. Therefore, this study broadens the conceptualisation of distance from the prevalent dyadic view towards a field perspective. To test and explain the conceptualisation of distance in a field perspective, I developed a novel construct, called the ‘transnational distance field’. The proposed construct is anchored on the CAGE distance framework and the field theory. The usefulness of the transnational distance field construct was tested at the national level by looking at country performance in a global value chain, namely for the food and beverage sector. In each country’s food and beverage global value chain, all the CAGE distance dimensions were determined for all its customer and supplier countries. Their relationship with the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) of the country in that sector was then tested. The outcome of the study provided evidence that distance indeed functions as a field. Particularly relationships with customers are sensitive to distance indicators: The evidence showed that the cultural distance diversity of customer countries is positively correlated and their economic distance diversity in terms of income level groups negatively correlated to RCA. Both these relationships were also shown to be moderated by the administrative membership of customer countries to regional trade blocs. The only supported supplier related hypothesis was of the positive relationship between administrative membership of supplier countries to regional trade blocs and RCA. In summary, the field conceptualisation was shown to function counter-intuitively in that greater diversity is positive and not negative. The results of this study justified the argument for the need to broaden our conceptualisation of distance in international business from a dyadic view to a field perspective. This outcome agrees with a recent study that proposed the use of a diversity framework as an alternative approach to studying distance phenomena involving more than two entities. This study will assist firms and policy makers to formulate optimised strategic responses to various distance diversities in transnational fields. pagibs2024 2024-10-01T09:47:15Z 2024-10-01T09:47:15Z 2023 2024-09-30 Thesis * S2024 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98410 en © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Distance
Transnational Organisational Field
Neo-institutional Theory
Field Theory
UCTD
Mahomva, Blessing
Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title_full Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title_fullStr Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title_full_unstemmed Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title_short Transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage : conceptualising distance as a field
title_sort transnational organisational fields and revealed comparative advantage conceptualising distance as a field
topic Distance
Transnational Organisational Field
Neo-institutional Theory
Field Theory
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/98410
work_keys_str_mv AT mahomvablessing transnationalorganisationalfieldsandrevealedcomparativeadvantageconceptualisingdistanceasafield