Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa

Dissertation (MSc (Zoology))--University of Pretoria, 1999.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Pretoria 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613538590130176
access_status_str Open Access
author2 Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt
author_browse Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt
author_facet Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
description Dissertation (MSc (Zoology))--University of Pretoria, 1999.
format Thesis
id oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/99602
institution University of Pretoria (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:44.604Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher University of Pretoria
publisherStr University of Pretoria
record_format dspace
source_str UPSpace — University of Pretoria Institutional Repository
spelling oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/99602 Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt Peddemors, V.M. Keith, Mark Population biology Humpback dolphins Richards bay South Africa UCTD Dissertation (MSc (Zoology))--University of Pretoria, 1999. During the last 19 years a minimum of 72 humpback dolphins Sousa chinensis were retrieved from the Richards Bay shark nets. Recently developed acoustic warning devices led to the introduction of these devices (pingers) into the shark nets at Richards Bay in an attempt to reduce the number of humpback dolphins captured in the nets. With the KwaZulu-Natal population set at approximately 200 animals this step led to the conception of the Richards Bay Humpback Dolphin Project. The present study was designed to obtain data that would reflect the state of the humpback dolphin population frequenting the Richards Bay area. The study was conducted during April to October of 1998 at Richards Bay (28° 48' S, 032° 06' E), on the eastern coast of KwaZulu-Natal. Humpback dolphins frequented the Richards Bay area throughout the study period with the average group size being 8.72 (± 5.13). Data suggests that the Richards Bay area may be a suitable nursery are~ since "females" with calves in close attendance, were frequently sighted in the study area. Humpback dolphins were seen most frequently in the southern and harbour mouth region of the study area and these areas most likely represent preferred areas. Collection of biotic and abiotic data throughout the study are~ such as water visibility, water temperature and ocean depth were used to correlate any noticeable environmental differences in area utilisation of humpback dolphin groups found in the study area. Only water depth seemed to limit the distribution of this species. No preference for turbid waters were evident during the study. Little or no preference for certain water temperature regimes were evident. Analysis of capture data of humpback dolphins in the Richards Bay shark nets revealed an average capture rate of 3.79 (S.D. ± 3.08) dolphins per year during the 19- year period of installation. The number of dolphins captured in relation to the total length of nets in the particular installation do not seem to be correlated. Peaks in captures existed during the winter months (June to August). Humpback dolphin follows within the harbour and harbour mouth occurred primarily from June to August, the period which coincided with the dolphin captures of 1998 in the Richards Bay installation. Differences in seasonal utilisation and movement of humpback dolphins may lead to an increase in the number of dolphins caught during the winter months within the Richards Bay shark net installation. The number of newly identified individuals did not decrease with time, suggesting that the population sampled at Richards Bay may appear to be an open population. Using all identified individuals sighted during this study, a population of 213 (± 42.72 at the 95% confidence level) individuals was calculated. The continual discovery of new individuals in conjunction with some individuals exhibiting long distance movements along the coast, indicate that a large part of the sampled population does not constitute dolphins actually "resident" within the study area. As the majority of the identified individuals (63 % ) were only photographed once within the study area, unfamiliarity may be one of the main reasons contributing to the high humpback dolphin capture rate in the Richards Bay installation. Unfortunately, social structure estimates of humpback dolphins were severely hampered by irregular movements of dolphin groups. Active acoustic deterrent devices (pingers) were introduced during June 1998 into the Richards Bay shark net installation in an effort to reduce the rate of capture of humpback dolphins in the shark nets. Humpback dolphins frequented the netted areas with and without pingers in place and even though three dolphins were caught in the shark nets, no final conclusion could be made about to the efficacy of the pingers, as all three captures took place during non-active pinger (dummies) periods. Continued investigation into the efficacy of the pingers is therefore needed. The observed site fidelity and home ranges indicated that the Richards Bay area may be for some individuals a "core area" or "preferred area" while others individuals just pass through. Humpback dolphins studied in the Richards Bay area displayed differences in site fidelity and had distinct levels of residency to the study area, affected by various unknown factors. In conclusion, the continuous monitoring of the KZN humpback dolphin population is imperative, to ascertain any change in the current status, as population depletion in conjunction with mass habitat destruction, usually go un-noticed and unchallenged. Zoology and Entomology MSc (Zoology) 2024-11-27T09:16:26Z 2024-11-27T09:16:26Z 21/11/18 1999 Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99602 en © 2024 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. application/pdf University of Pretoria
spellingShingle Population biology
Humpback dolphins
Richards bay
South Africa
UCTD
Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title_full Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title_fullStr Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title_short Population biology of humpback dolphins in Richards bay, South Africa
title_sort population biology of humpback dolphins in richards bay south africa
topic Population biology
Humpback dolphins
Richards bay
South Africa
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99602