Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication

Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2017.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
Other Authors: Thom, Sjarlene
Format: Thesis
Language:en_ZA
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613800945942528
access_status_str Open Access
author Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
author2 Thom, Sjarlene
author_browse Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
Thom, Sjarlene
author_facet Thom, Sjarlene
Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
author_sort Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2017.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/102682
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language en_ZA
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:41:54.752Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/102682 Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication Coetzee, Chris Rudolf Thom, Sjarlene Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Ancient Studies. Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Criticism and interpretation Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Oratory -- Criticism and interpretation Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Philosophy -- Criticism and interpretation UCTD Thesis (MA)--Stellenbosch University, 2017. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study investigates the question whether Cicero published to serve his own glory, or whether he published to serve the commonwealth, in other words, to whose benefit (cui bono) was publication? After exploring the context in which Cicero published, the study considers eight reasons for publication, namely publication to add to his personal glory, to elicit literary favours, to promote his own works, to reply to his critics, to promote a political agenda, to educate society, to promote Latin literature, and to pay compliments. While the study considered all surviving works, I argue that the conference at Luca in 56 BCE and Cicero’s subsequent retirement from politics constituted a watershed, after which his publication habits changed. Therefore, the study focused primarily on the works concerning oratory and philosophy. Important additional information concerning the circumstances of composition and publication were sought in the letters. After considering these various reasons for publication, I come to the conclusion that Cicero's decision to publish was motivated by his quest for personal glory, mostly as a form of rehabilitation after his exile from 58 to 57 BCE. Publishing to serve the commonwealth in the end seems only of secondary concern. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie ondersoek Cicero se redes vir publikasie en probeer vasstel of hy publiseer tot voordeel van sy eie roem of tot voordeel van die gemeenskap, met ander woorde, tot wie se voordeel (cui bono) was publikasie? Na ’n oorsig van die omstandighede en omgewing waarin Cicero publiseer, identifiseer hierdie studie agt redes vir publikasie, naamlik publikasie ter uitbreiding van sy eie roem, tot ontlokking van literêre gunste, ter bevordering van sy eie werke, tot weerlegging van kritici, tot bevordering van politieke doelwitte, tot opvoeding van die gemeenskap, tot bevordering van die Latynse letterkunde, en om te komplimenteer. Alhoewel hierdie studie alle oorblywende werke oorweeg het, argumenteer die studie dat die konferensie by Luca in 56 v.C. en Cicero se daaropvolgende politieke aftrede ’n merkwaardige verandering in sy publikasiegewoontes tot gevolg gehad het. Hierdie studie fokus dus hoofsaaklik op Cicero se retoriese en filosofiese werke. Die briewe is ook ondersoek om belangrike addisionele informasie aan die lig te bring aangaande die omstandighede waaronder hy geskryf en gepubliseer het. Na oorweging van verskeie redes vir publikasie, kom die studie tot die gevolgtrekking dat Cicero se besluit om te publiseer gemotiveer is deur sy behoefte aan persoonlike roem, meestal om die eer wat geskend was tydens sy ballingskap van 58 tot 57 v.C te herstel. Publikasie tot voordeel van die gemeenskap blyk telkens ’n sekondêre motivering te wees. Masters 2017-05-09T17:39:32Z 2017-12-11T10:41:06Z 2017-05-09T17:39:32Z 2017-12-11T10:41:06Z 2017-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102682 en_ZA Stellenbosch University 115 pages application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Criticism and interpretation
Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Oratory -- Criticism and interpretation
Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Philosophy -- Criticism and interpretation
UCTD
Coetzee, Chris Rudolf
Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title_full Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title_fullStr Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title_full_unstemmed Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title_short Cui bono? Cicero's reasons for publication
title_sort cui bono cicero s reasons for publication
topic Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Criticism and interpretation
Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Oratory -- Criticism and interpretation
Cicero, Marcus Tullius -- Philosophy -- Criticism and interpretation
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102682
work_keys_str_mv AT coetzeechrisrudolf cuibonocicerosreasonsforpublication