Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59

Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2019.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
Other Authors: Mouton, Elna
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613836385714176
access_status_str Open Access
author Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
author2 Mouton, Elna
author_browse Mouton, Elna
Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
author_facet Mouton, Elna
Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
author_sort Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2019.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/107088
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:42:28.529Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/107088 Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59 Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba Mouton, Elna Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Theology. Dept. of Old and New Testament. Judaism (Christian theology) Ethnicity -- Religious aspects -- Christianity Bible. John, XIII, 12-59 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. UCTD Thesis (MTh)--Stellenbosch University, 2019. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: John 8:44 is a verse that has often justified Christians’ traditionally negative attitude towards Judaism, by indicating that the Judeans’ father is the devil, hence supporting the historical labelling of Jews as “children of Satan”. This kind of embarrassment regarding the reception history of a text happens when we limit our interpretation to its linguistic context only, instead of accounting for the historical, ideological, and sociological dimensions of the text as well. Texts are usually written in response to changing social circumstances. It is important, then, to realise that when we approach the Bible in general, and the New Testament in particular, we are not reading about people or characters who have fixed, homogeneous, and hypostatised religious identities, but about groups who are developing and formulating their identity within a diverse and changing social milieu. Therefore, reading John 8:12-59 within its socio-political context, aims at exploring the identity of the characters involved by understanding the text within the socio-historical world from which it originated. A rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59 within its socio-political context attempts, therefore, to solve the interpretation problem referred to above by accounting for the historical, ideological, and sociological contexts of its time. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Johannes 8:44 is ’n vers waarmee Christene se tradisioneel negatiewe houding jeens Judaïsme dikwels geregverdig word – deur die siening dat die vader van die Jode die duiwel is, wat Jode by implikasie as “kinders van Satan” tipeer. Dié soort verleentheid met betrekking tot die verstaansgeskiedenis van die teks ontstaan wanneer die interpretasie van sodanige tekste slegs tot hulle linguistiese konteks beperk word, en historiese, ideologiese en sosiologiese kontekste geïgnoreer word. Tekste word gewoonlik geskryf as reaksie en in antwoord op veranderende sosiale omstandighede. Gevolglik is dit belangrik dat ons benadering tot die verstaan van die Bybel in die algemeen, en die Nuwe Testament in besonder, moet wees dat ons nie alleen met mense of karakters se vaste godsdienstige identiteit te make het nie, maar met groepe wat ontwikkel en hulle identiteit teen die agtergrond van ’n diverse en veranderende sosiale milieu formuleer. Om Johannes 8:12-59 in sosio-politieke konteks te lees het daarom ten doel om die identiteit van die betrokke karakters binne die sosio-historiese wêreld waarin die teks ontstaan het, te verstaan. ’n Retoriese analise van Johannes 8:12-59 in sosio-politieke konteks poog dus om die interpretasieprobleem waarna hierbo verwys word, op te los – met inagneming van die historiese, ideologiese, en sosiologiese kontekste waarbinne die teks geskryf is. Masters 2019-11-13T12:26:58Z 2019-12-11T06:46:44Z 2019-11-13T12:26:58Z 2019-12-11T06:46:44Z 2019-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/107088 en Stellenbosch University 155 pages application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Judaism (Christian theology)
Ethnicity -- Religious aspects -- Christianity
Bible. John, XIII, 12-59 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
UCTD
Qina, Axolile Ntsika Mandaba
Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title_full Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title_fullStr Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title_full_unstemmed Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title_short Reading John’s gospel within its socio-political context : a rhetorical analysis of John 8:12-59
title_sort reading john s gospel within its socio political context a rhetorical analysis of john 8 12 59
topic Judaism (Christian theology)
Ethnicity -- Religious aspects -- Christianity
Bible. John, XIII, 12-59 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
UCTD
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/107088
work_keys_str_mv AT qinaaxolilentsikamandaba readingjohnsgospelwithinitssociopoliticalcontextarhetoricalanalysisofjohn81259