Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law

Thesis (LLD)--Stellenbosch University, 2025.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Uys, Hugo
Other Authors: Botha, Henk
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613775695183872
access_status_str Open Access
author Uys, Hugo
author2 Botha, Henk
author_browse Botha, Henk
Uys, Hugo
author_facet Botha, Henk
Uys, Hugo
author_sort Uys, Hugo
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv Stellenbosch University
description Thesis (LLD)--Stellenbosch University, 2025.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/132384
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:41:30.564Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/132384 Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law Uys, Hugo Botha, Henk Du Toit, Louise Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Law. Dept. of Public Law. Animal rights -- Law and legislation Human-animal relationships Animals rights -- Moral and ethical aspects Posthumanism Animal welfare -- Law and legislation UCTD Thesis (LLD)--Stellenbosch University, 2025. Uys, H. 2025. Framed and Caged: Theorising the Vulnerability of Animal Bodies Before the Law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University [online]. Available: https://scholar.sun.ac.za/items/1cf68853-6d99-49a0-b102-ba4ab9a64fee ENGLISH ABSTRACT: It comes as no surprise that scholars in law and philosophy widely recognise that contemporary society routinely inflicts severe and wide-scale suffering on animals. Consequently, there have been various attempts to harness the coercive force of law to alleviate the societal subjugation of animals. Yet, despite their laudable aims, animal advocacy efforts remain largely ineffective at realising a wide-spread transformation of human-animal relations. One significant challenge for these animal advocacy efforts is the law’s failure to confront its own complicity in enabling and maintaining the ongoing suffering of animals, and hence its own inability to meaningfully prevent, intervene, and/or redress animal subjugation. As such, this study offers a sympathetic critique of contemporary animal advocacy. It asks whether, and to what extent, a philosophico-theoretical framework which recognises the intercorporeal vulnerability of (human and nonhuman) animal bodies might displace anthropocentrism as a quasi-transcendental limit of the law. This question is considered by reading critical legal theory through the emerging posthumanities to outline a posthuman legal theory whence to pursue the future postanthropocentric development of animal law. Given its pervasiveness, a critique of anthropocentrism as a limit of thought and imagination implicates not just an isolated field of study, but cuts across all aspects, fields, institutions, values, beliefs, and practices of contemporary society. Accordingly, this study adopts a post-disciplinary poethical approach – a method at once critical and creative – to show and enact the possibility of post-anthropocentric law. To this end, it draws generously on a number of discourses emerging from the critical (post)humanities – such as decolonial studies, critical animal studies, contemporary feminism(s), post-phenomenology, the Black radical tradition, environmental studies, and somatechnics. Out of the various connections and tensions between these discourses, this study composes a renewed conceptual register – of animal flesh, ‘the (e)rectitude of the (hu)man’, fractal entre-deux(s), and juridical economies – with which to trouble anthropocentrism as a quasi-transcendental limit of legal theoretical discourse. Ultimately, the study calls for a renewed liberatory ethico-onto epistemology whence and whereby we might (yet) reimagine embodiment, animality, and law – that is, the very World as we know it. AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Geen opsomming beskikbaar. Doctoral 2025-06-05T11:44:51Z 2025-06-05T11:44:51Z 2025-03 Thesis https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/132384 en Stellenbosch University x, 348 pages : illustrations application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle Animal rights -- Law and legislation
Human-animal relationships
Animals rights -- Moral and ethical aspects
Posthumanism
Animal welfare -- Law and legislation
UCTD
Uys, Hugo
Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title_full Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title_fullStr Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title_full_unstemmed Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title_short Framed and caged : theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
title_sort framed and caged theorising the vulnerability of animal bodies before the law
topic Animal rights -- Law and legislation
Human-animal relationships
Animals rights -- Moral and ethical aspects
Posthumanism
Animal welfare -- Law and legislation
UCTD
url https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/132384
work_keys_str_mv AT uyshugo framedandcagedtheorisingthevulnerabilityofanimalbodiesbeforethelaw