Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law
Thesis (MEng)--Stellenbosch University, 2026.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
2026
|
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613901025181696 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Spies, Luka |
| author2 | Bekker, James |
| author_browse | Bekker, James Spies, Luka |
| author_facet | Bekker, James Spies, Luka |
| author_sort | Spies, Luka |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | Stellenbosch University |
| description | Thesis (MEng)--Stellenbosch University, 2026. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/135818 |
| institution | Stellenbosch University (South Africa) |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:43:30.254Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University |
| publisherStr | Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository |
| spelling | oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/135818 Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law Spies, Luka Bekker, James Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Engineering. Dept. of Industrial Engineering. Thesis (MEng)--Stellenbosch University, 2026. Spies, L. 2026. Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law. Unpublished masters thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University [online]. Available: https://scholar.sun.ac.za/items/61c20861-d8dd-461a-ba33-062d179087a9 TymeBank’s traditional rule-based system for Anti-Money Laundering generates a high volume of false-positive alerts. From an industrial engineering perspective, this creates a significant process inefficiency, resulting in a costly and unscalable investigative bottleneck that consumes analyst resources and diverts focus from genuine financial crime. This research addresses the problem by developing a machine learning risk-scoring system. The system pursues multiple objectives, aiming to enhance fraud detection by identifying genuine mule accounts while simultaneously enabling risk-based prioritisation to reduce wasted investigative effort. Using TymeBank’s anonymised data, a controlled experiment compared baseline models (Model A), trained on the full dataset, against specialised models (Model B). These specialised configurations were trained only on high-transaction profiles and incorporated additional features derived from Benford’s Law. A range of algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Na¨ıve Bayes, Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Random Forests, was systematically evaluated. To assess models against the multiple objectives, a bespoke evaluation approach with a businessoriented focus was developed. Standard statistical metrics, such as accuracy, are often misleading in the context of imbalanced data, while precision and recall present inherent trade-offs. To address this, a Total Cost function was introduced to determine the balance between effective fraud detection and the high cost of unnecessary investigations, with the latter being directly quantified through a Resource Efficiency metric. The results suggest that a Random Forest, Model A provides the most cost-effective solution, achieving the lowest Total Cost and the highest Resource Efficiency among all tested configurations. In contrast, the specialised Model B exhibited a pronounced trade-off. Although it achieved an increase in the Fraud Capture Rate, this was accompanied by a decrease in Resource Efficiency, leading to a higher overall Total Cost. These results indicate that the predictive value of a larger, general dataset, as utilised by Model A, was more influential on overall performance than the niche statistical features employed by Model B. Finally, SHAP analysis confirmed that the model’s logic is sound, basing its high-risk predictions on intuitive patterns, such as rapid balance depletion. This research contributes an interpretable model and a specialised, cost-centric framework for evaluating AML systems. It provides TymeBank with a validated, data-driven method to enhance operational efficiency, reduce resource waste, and reinforce the fundamental trust that underpins the financial system. Masters 2026-04-10T13:45:12Z 2026-04-10T13:45:12Z 2026-03 Thesis https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/135818 en Stellenbosch University 207 pages application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University |
| spellingShingle | Spies, Luka Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title | Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title_full | Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title_fullStr | Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title_short | Money Laundering Alert Prioritisation Using Machine Learning and Benford’s Law |
| title_sort | money laundering alert prioritisation using machine learning and benford s law |
| url | https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/135818 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT spiesluka moneylaunderingalertprioritisationusingmachinelearningandbenfordslaw |