Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap

Thesis (MA (Political Science. International Studies))--Stellenbosch University, 2008.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
Other Authors: Smith, Karen
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University 2008
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613963758338048
access_status_str Open Access
author Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
author2 Smith, Karen
author_browse Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
Smith, Karen
author_facet Smith, Karen
Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
author_sort Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv University of Stellenbosch
description Thesis (MA (Political Science. International Studies))--Stellenbosch University, 2008.
format Thesis
id oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1683
institution Stellenbosch University (South Africa)
language English
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:44:29.748Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
publisherStr Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
record_format dspace
source_str SUNScholar — Stellenbosch University Repository
spelling oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/1683 International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap Dietrich, Nicholas Julian Smith, Karen Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Dept. of Political Science. International relations theory Theses -- Political science Dissertations -- Political science International relations -- Developing countries Academic achievement -- Developing countries Political Science Thesis (MA (Political Science. International Studies))--Stellenbosch University, 2008. This thesis takes as its point of departure the problem that the disciplined study of International Relations (IR), whose very basis of existence makes claims towards universality and international applicability, is seen by some to push pertinent issues relating to the majority of the world’s population to the periphery of its enquiry. It begins by exploring the concept “Third World”, arguing for its continued relevance in the post- Cold War arena as generalised term when referring to the “majority of the world’s population”. It is then theorised that one can parallel the marginalisation of the Third World in the global political economy with a perceived marginalisation of a “Third World academic” in the discipline of IR. By making use of both quantitative and qualitative methods, the thesis investigates the production of knowledge within the discipline of IR theory to argue that a possible root cause for the above problem could be the absence of Third World academic contributions to the core of the discipline. Embarking from the notion that IR theory is dominated by a British-American condominium of authorship, by re-interpreting the data provided by Ole Waever on academic contributions to leading IR journals, the researcher concludes that “Third World academics” find themselves on the periphery of knowledge production within the discipline of IR and are therefore dependent on the core to construct knowledge. A brief critical look at the history of the social sciences dominated by Western science as a hegemonic and specific “ethnoscience” furthermore puts into context the development of IR as a conversation dominated by voices from the First World academic community. With reference to the concepts of “responsibility” and “reflexivity” as they relate to theory, it is proposed that the development of IR as a discipline can be equated to a dialogue/conversation rather than a debate. For the dialogue to be responsible, all voices should be considered valid contributors, while all contributors should themselves act responsibly by being selfreflexive. Ultimately, although the discipline of IR must open up to contributions from the Third World, for the development of a truly global discipline that reflects the diversity of global interactions, it is necessary for academics from the Third World to establish themselves within the discourse by producing valuable contributions towards advancing the discipline as a whole and stepping out of the periphery by realising the importance of teaching and understanding “theory”. Masters 2008-11-26T14:15:20Z 2010-06-01T08:30:39Z 2008-11-26T14:15:20Z 2010-06-01T08:30:39Z 2008-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1683 en University of Stellenbosch application/pdf Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University
spellingShingle International relations theory
Theses -- Political science
Dissertations -- Political science
International relations -- Developing countries
Academic achievement -- Developing countries
Political Science
Dietrich, Nicholas Julian
International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title_full International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title_fullStr International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title_full_unstemmed International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title_short International relations theory and the third world academic : bridging the gap
title_sort international relations theory and the third world academic bridging the gap
topic International relations theory
Theses -- Political science
Dissertations -- Political science
International relations -- Developing countries
Academic achievement -- Developing countries
Political Science
url http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1683
work_keys_str_mv AT dietrichnicholasjulian internationalrelationstheoryandthethirdworldacademicbridgingthegap